Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Subgroup characteristics in care workers with low back pain: cluster analysis-based severity of central sensitivity syndromes and low back pain.
Shigetoh, Hayato; Abiko, Teppei; Ohyama, Michie; Sakata, Eiji; Murata, Shin.
Affiliation
  • Shigetoh H; Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Kyoto Tachibana University, 34 Yamada-cho, Oyake, Yamashina-ku, Kyoto, 607-8175, Japan. shigeto@tachibana-u.ac.jp.
  • Abiko T; Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Kyoto Tachibana University, 34 Yamada-cho, Oyake, Yamashina-ku, Kyoto, 607-8175, Japan.
  • Ohyama M; Non-Profit Organization NPO Fukusiyogunet, Tagawa, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Sakata E; Non-Profit Organization NPO Fukusiyogunet, Tagawa, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Murata S; Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Kyoto Tachibana University, 34 Yamada-cho, Oyake, Yamashina-ku, Kyoto, 607-8175, Japan.
Eur Spine J ; 33(4): 1447-1454, 2024 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38347272
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This multicentre, collaborative, cross-sectional study aimed to explore the characteristics of subgroups based on central sensitivity syndromes (CSSs) and low back pain (LBP) severity. Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between the classified subgroups and work status among the care workers. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

In 660 care workers, we assessed LBP intensity, pain duration, pain sites, CSS (using the central sensitization inventory-9), psychological factors (using the pain catastrophizing scale and pain self-efficacy questionnaire), and work status (interference, amount of assistance, frequency of assistance, and work environment). We used hierarchical clustering analysis to divide the participants into subgroups based on CSS and LBP severity. We further performed multiple comparison analyzes and adjusted the residuals (chi-square test) to reveal differences between clusters.

RESULTS:

Care workers with LBP were divided into four subgroups (Cluster 1 no CSS and mild LBP, Cluster 2 mild CSS and severe LBP, Cluster 3 mild CSS and mild LBP, Cluster 4 severe CSS and moderate LBP). Cluster 4 tended to have a higher number of pain sites, severe pain catastrophizing, and poor pain self-efficacy. In addition, Cluster 4 showed a higher frequency of assistance and an inadequate working environment and equipment. By contrast, Cluster 2 tended to have low pain self-efficacy. In addition, Cluster 2 experienced the highest work-related interference compared with any of the subgroups.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings suggested that the severe LBP and severe CSS subgroups had common and different characteristics concerning psychological factors and work status, including interference with work. Our results may help to improve the management of care workers with LBP.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Low Back Pain Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur Spine J Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Low Back Pain Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur Spine J Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan