Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of prehabilitation during neoadjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review.
Ikeda, Tomohiro; Toyama, Shusuke; Harada, Tsuyoshi; Noma, Kazuhiro; Hamada, Masanori; Kitagawa, Takashi.
Affiliation
  • Ikeda T; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan. pn9375yc@s.okayama-u.ac.jp.
  • Toyama S; Department of Rehabilitation, Tagami Hospital, 2-14-15 tagami, Nagasaki, Japan.
  • Harada T; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
  • Noma K; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University Graduate School, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hamada M; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
  • Kitagawa T; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Esophagus ; 21(3): 283-297, 2024 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411724
ABSTRACT
Progression of the physical weakness during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer is a serious problem; however, prehabilitation during NAT has the potential to overcome the unmet need. Nevertheless, systematic reviews on this topic have not been summarized. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to determine prehabilitation's effectiveness, acceptability, and safety during NAT for patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. An electronic search was performed in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PEDro databases. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness of prehabilitation during NAT, along with a descriptive analysis of acceptance and safety. This study analyzed data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine non-RCTs involving 664 patients. The meta-analysis of two RCTs demonstrated that prehabilitation during NAT may be more effective than usual care in enhancing tolerance to NAT and grip strength; moreover, one RCT and three non-RCTs revealed that prehabilitation may reduce the risk of postoperative complications. The adherence rates for exercise programs in two RCTs and seven non-RCTs were 55-76%. Additionally, two studies reported a 76% adherence rate for multimodal prehabilitation programs, including exercise, dietary, and psychological care. Six studies reported no serious prehabilitation-related adverse events during NAT. Prehabilitation during NAT may be a safe and beneficial intervention strategy for patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. However, the investigation of strategies to enhance adherence is essential. Furthermore, additional high-quality RCTs are needed to examine the effect of prehabilitation during NAT.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Neoadjuvant Therapy / Esophagogastric Junction Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Esophagus Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Neoadjuvant Therapy / Esophagogastric Junction Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Esophagus Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan