Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Efficacy of Real-time Computer-aided Detection of Colonic Neoplasia in Community Practice: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.
Thiruvengadam, Nikhil R; Solaimani, Pejman; Shrestha, Manish; Buller, Seth; Carson, Rachel; Reyes-Garcia, Breanna; Gnass, Ronaldo D; Wang, Bing; Albasha, Natalie; Leonor, Paul; Saumoy, Monica; Coimbra, Raul; Tabuenca, Arnold; Srikureja, Wichit; Serrao, Steve.
Affiliation
  • Thiruvengadam NR; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California. Electronic address: nikhilt88@hotmail.com.
  • Solaimani P; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California.
  • Shrestha M; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California.
  • Buller S; Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California.
  • Carson R; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California.
  • Reyes-Garcia B; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California.
  • Gnass RD; Department of Pathology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California.
  • Wang B; Department of Pathology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California.
  • Albasha N; University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California; Department of Medicine, Scripps Green Hospital, La Jolla, California.
  • Leonor P; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California.
  • Saumoy M; Center for Digestive Health, Penn Medicine Princeton Medical Center, Plainsboro, New Jersey.
  • Coimbra R; Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Department of Surgery, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California.
  • Tabuenca A; Department of Surgery, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Department of Surgery, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California.
  • Srikureja W; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California.
  • Serrao S; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38437999
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND &

AIMS:

The use of computer-aided detection (CADe) has increased the adenoma detection rates (ADRs) during colorectal cancer (CRC) screening/surveillance in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but has not shown benefit in real-world implementation studies. We performed a single-center pragmatic RCT to evaluate the impact of real-time CADe on ADRs in colonoscopy performed by community gastroenterologists.

METHODS:

We enrolled 1100 patients undergoing colonoscopy for CRC screening, surveillance, positive fecal-immunohistochemical tests, and diagnostic indications at one community-based center from September 2022 to March 2023. Patients were randomly assigned (11) to traditional colonoscopy or real-time CADe. Blinded pathologists analyzed histopathologic findings. The primary outcome was ADR (the percentage of patients with at least 1 histologically proven adenoma or carcinoma). Secondary outcomes were adenomas detected per colonoscopy (APC), sessile-serrated lesion detection rate, and non-neoplastic resection rate.

RESULTS:

The median age was 55.5 years (interquartile range, 50-62 years), 61% were female, 72.7% were of Hispanic ethnicity, and 9.1% had inadequate bowel preparation. The ADR for the CADe group was significantly higher than the traditional colonoscopy group (42.5% vs 34.4%; P = .005). The mean APC was significantly higher in the CADe group compared with the traditional colonoscopy group (0.89 ± 1.46 vs 0.60 ± 1.12; P < .001). The improvement in adenoma detection was driven by increased detection of <5 mm adenomas. CADe had a higher sessile-serrated lesion detection rate than traditional colonoscopy (4.7% vs 2.0%; P = .01). The improvement in ADR with CADe was significantly higher in the first half of the study (47.2% vs 33.7%; P = .002) compared with the second half (38.7% vs 34.9%; P = .33).

CONCLUSIONS:

In a single-center pragmatic RCT, real-time CADe modestly improved ADR and APC in average-detector community endoscopists. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05963724).
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article