Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What Is a Meaningful Difference When Using Infarct Volume as the Primary Outcome?: Results From the HERMES Database.
Rinkel, Leon A; Ospel, Johanna M; Brown, Scott B; Campbell, Bruce C V; Dippel, Diederik W J; Demchuk, Andrew M; Majoie, Charles B L M; Mitchell, Peter J; Bracard, Serge; Guillemin, Francis; Jovin, Tudor G; Muir, Keith W; White, Philip; Saver, Jeffrey L; Hill, Michael D; Goyal, Mayank.
Affiliation
  • Rinkel LA; Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands (L.A.R.).
  • Ospel JM; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, AB, Canada (L.A.R., J.M.O., A.M.D., M.D.H., M.G.).
  • Brown SB; Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands (L.A.R.).
  • Campbell BCV; BRIGHT Research Partners, Inc, Mooresville, NC (S.B.B.).
  • Dippel DWJ; Department of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre, Australia (B.C.V.C.).
  • Demchuk AM; Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (D.W.J.D.).
  • Majoie CBLM; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, AB, Canada (L.A.R., J.M.O., A.M.D., M.D.H., M.G.).
  • Mitchell PJ; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.B.L.M.M.).
  • Bracard S; Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Australia (P.J.M.).
  • Guillemin F; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Lorraine and University Hospital of Nancy, France (S.B.).
  • Jovin TG; Clinical Epidemiology Center, University of Lorraine and University Hospital of Nancy, Inserm and Université de Lorraine, France (F.G.).
  • Muir KW; Department of Neurology, Stroke Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Stroke Institute, Presbyterian University Hospital, PA (T.G.J.).
  • White P; Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, United Kingdom (K.W.M.).
  • Saver JL; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom (P.W.).
  • Hill MD; Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (J.L.S.).
  • Goyal M; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, AB, Canada (L.A.R., J.M.O., A.M.D., M.D.H., M.G.).
Stroke ; 55(4): 866-873, 2024 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38440891
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ischemic stroke lesion volume at follow-up is an important surrogate outcome for acute stroke trials. We aimed to assess which differences in 48-hour lesion volume translate into meaningful clinical differences.

METHODS:

We used pooled data from 7 trials investigating the efficacy of endovascular treatment for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke. We assessed 48-hour lesion volume follow-up computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The primary outcome was a good functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0 to 2. We performed multivariable logistic regression to predict the probability of achieving mRS scores of 0 to 2 and determined the differences in 48-hour lesion volume that correspond to a change of 1%, 5%, and 10% in the adjusted probability of achieving mRS scores of 0 to 2.

RESULTS:

In total, 1665/1766 (94.2%) patients (median age, 68 [interquartile range, 57-76] years, 781 [46.9%] female) had information on follow-up ischemic lesion volume. Computed tomography was used for follow-up imaging in 83% of patients. The median 48-hour lesion volume was 41 (interquartile range, 14-120) mL. We observed a linear relationship between 48-hour lesion volume and mRS scores of 0 to 2 for adjusted probabilities between 65% and 20%/volumes <80 mL, although the curve sloped off for lower mRS scores of 0-2 probabilities/higher volumes. The median differences in 48-hour lesion volume associated with a 1%, 5%, and 10% increase in the probability of mRS scores of 0 to 2 for volumes <80 mL were 2 (interquartile range, 2-3), 10 (9-11), and 20 (18-23) mL, respectively. We found comparable associations when assessing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging separately.

CONCLUSIONS:

A difference of 2, 10, and 20 mL in 48-hour lesion volume, respectively, is associated with a 1%, 5%, and 10% absolute increase in the probability of achieving good functional outcome. These results can inform the design of future stroke trials that use 48-hour lesion volume as the primary outcome.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Ischemia / Stroke / Endovascular Procedures / Ischemic Stroke Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Stroke Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Ischemia / Stroke / Endovascular Procedures / Ischemic Stroke Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Stroke Year: 2024 Type: Article