Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A New Community-to-Hospital Specialist Otology Pathway Using Telemedicine: A Pilot Study of 50 Patients.
Patel, Ankit; Forde, Cillian; Doal, Suneal; Patel, Jay; Clare, Dawn; Burslem, Michael; Manjaly, Joseph G; Mehta, Nishchay.
Affiliation
  • Patel A; ENT Department, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, UK.
  • Forde C; ENT Department, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, UK.
  • Doal S; ENT Department, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, UK.
  • Patel J; ENT Department, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, UK.
  • Clare D; ENT Department, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, UK.
  • Burslem M; ENT Department, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, UK.
  • Manjaly JG; ENT Department, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, UK.
  • Mehta N; UCLH Biomedical Research Centre Hearing Health Theme, London, UK.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 49(5): 652-659, 2024 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38899484
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Pathway innovation using smartphone otoscopy and tablet-based audiometry technologies to deliver ear and hearing services via trained audiologists may improve efficiency of the service. An ENT-integrated-community-ear service (ENTICES-combining community audiology management, remote ENT review and novel technologies) was piloted. We aimed to assess the efficiency and safety of ENTICES.

METHOD:

ENTICES was a community-based and audiologist-led pathway. Patients with otological symptoms were self-referred to this service. Smartphone otoscopy and tablet-based audiograms were performed. Two otologists reviewed all decisions made in the community by audiologists based on video-otoscopy, hearing tests and chart reviews. Data on the first 50 consecutive new patients attending either consultant-led hospital otology clinics (HOC), audiologist-led hospital advanced audiology diagnostics (AAD) or ENTICES clinics were collected between 1 August 2021 and 31 December 2021. Data were collected through chart reviews and questionnaires to compare the three pathways with respect to efficiency, patient satisfaction, technology utility and safety.

RESULTS:

No audiology-led ENTICES decisions were amended by hospital otologists following remote review. Remote review of video-otoscopy with history was sufficient for a diagnosis in 80% of cases. Adding hearing tests and standardised history increased the diagnostic yield to 98%. Patient satisfaction scores showed 100% service recommendation. The cost per patient, per visit, was £83.36, £99.07 and £69.72 for AAD, HOC or ENTICES, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

ENTICES provides a safe ear and hearing service that patients rated highly. Thirty-two per cent of hospital otology patients were eligible for this service. For those patients, ENTICES is 20% more cost-effective and can reduce the number of clinic visits by up to 60% compared with HOC.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Otolaryngology / Telemedicine Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Otolaryngol Journal subject: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Otolaryngology / Telemedicine Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Otolaryngol Journal subject: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom