Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Qualitative evaluation of a multidisciplinary master of cancer sciences: impacts on graduates and influencing curricular factors.
Lai-Kwon, Julia; Woodward-Kron, Robyn; Seignior, David; Allen, Louise; McArthur, Grant; Barrett, Michelle; Kok, David L.
Affiliation
  • Lai-Kwon J; Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (VCCC) Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Woodward-Kron R; Department of Medical Education, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Seignior D; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 300 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
  • Allen L; Department of Medical Education, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • McArthur G; Melbourne School of Professional and Continuing Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Barrett M; Department of Medical Education, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Kok DL; Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (VCCC) Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Med Educ ; 24(1): 734, 2024 Jul 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38977978
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Evaluations of continuing professional development programs typically focus on short-term knowledge and skill acquisition. There is a need for more comprehensive program evaluation methods that assess a broader range of impacts and can elicit how and why these outcomes occurred. We conducted a qualitative study to investigate the impacts of a multidisciplinary, online health professional postgraduate degree and to gain insights into the factors that led to these impacts.

METHODS:

Participants were graduates of the University of Melbourne's Master of Cancer Sciences who could participate in an online interview. Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted exploring a broad range of impacts, including changes in professional practice and career trajectory since graduation, and how the degree influenced these impacts. Data were analysed inductively.

RESULTS:

Fifteen participants (female 80%, 31-50 years old 67%) from a range of professions were interviewed. A number of major themes were uncovered. Impacts on career trajectory included expanded career horizons (e.g. increased role diversity and complexity), and increased confidence in their professional identity. Impacts on professional practice included individual improvements in patient care and research, as well as changes in organisational practice. Factors identified as leading to these impacts were (i) active, interactive and interprofessional learning; (ii) networking, informal mentoring, and role-modelling; and (iii) support at multiple levels.

CONCLUSION:

This study provides preliminary evidence of the positive impact of a Master of Cancer Sciences on graduate career trajectory and professional practice. In addition, the inductive methodology enabled identification of the curricular features (both planned and emergent) that influenced these impacts, facilitating potential transferability of learnings to other teaching programs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Curriculum / Qualitative Research Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: BMC Med Educ Journal subject: EDUCACAO Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Curriculum / Qualitative Research Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: BMC Med Educ Journal subject: EDUCACAO Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia