Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Model-informed drug development of envafolimab, a subcutaneously injectable PD-L1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Cui, Cheng; Wang, Jing; Wang, Chunyang; Xu, Ting; Qin, Lan; Xiao, Shen; Gong, John; Song, Ling; Liu, Dongyang.
Affiliation
  • Cui C; Drug Clinical Trial Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang J; Institute of Medical Innovation and Research, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang C; Drug Clinical Trial Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Xu T; Institute of Medical Innovation and Research, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Qin L; Drug Clinical Trial Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Xiao S; Institute of Medical Innovation and Research, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Gong J; Alphamab Co., Ltd., Suzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Song L; 3DMedicines Co., Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
  • Liu D; 3DMedicines Co., Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Oncologist ; 2024 Jul 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982653
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Envafolimab is the first and only globally approved subcutaneously injectable PD-L1 antibody for the treatment of instability-high (MSI-H) or DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) advanced solid tumors in adults, including those with advanced colorectal cancer that has progressed after treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. The aim of this investigation was to examine the pharmacokinetic and exposure-response (E-R) profile of envafolimab in patients with solid tumors to support the approval of fixed and alternative dose regimens.

METHODS:

In this study, a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling approach will be employed to quantitatively evaluate intrinsic and extrinsic covariates. Additionally, PopPK-estimated exposure parameters were used to evaluate E-R relationship for safety and efficacy to provide a theoretical basis for recommending optimal treatment regimens. Simulations were performed on the dosing regimens of body weight-based regimen of 2.50 mg/kg QW, fixed dose 150 mg QW, and 300 mg Q2W for the selection of alternative dosing regimens. Data from 4 clinical studies (NCT02827968, NCT03101488, NCT03248843, and NCT03667170) were utilized.

RESULTS:

The PopPK dataset comprised 182 patients with 1810 evaluable envafolimab concentration records. Finally, a one-compartment model incorporating first-order absorption, first-order linear elimination, and time-dependent elimination according to an Emax function was found to accurately describe the concentration-time data of envafolimab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Creatinine clearance and country were identified as statistically significant factors affecting clearance, but had limited clinical significance. A relative flat exposure-response relationship was observed between early measures of safety and efficacy to verify that no dose adjustment is required. Simulation results indicated that 2.50 mg/kg QW, 150 mg QW, and 300 mg Q2W regimen yield similar steady-state exposure.

CONCLUSIONS:

No statistically significant difference was observed between weight-based and fixed dose regimens. Model-based simulation supports the adoption of a 150 mg weekly or 300 mg biweekly dosing regimen of envafolimab in the solid tumor population, as these schedules effectively balance survival benefits and safety risks.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Oncologist Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Oncologist Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Type: Article