Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative analysis of school food policies in Australian jurisdictions: Insights for more effective policy action.
Masila, Nicodemus; Smith, Kylie J; Waddingham, Suzanne; Jose, Kim.
Affiliation
  • Masila N; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Smith KJ; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Waddingham S; School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Jose K; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39165036
ABSTRACT
ISSUE ADDRESSED School food policies in Australia have the potential to positively impact healthy eating in schools. While the policies are reviewed regularly, it is unknown if revised school food policies have incorporated the recommendations from a 2020 review of nutrition policies in publicly funded institutions. This review aims to examine the current state of Australian school food policy environment, including national-level guidelines, food safety, allergy, and anaphylaxis management policies.

METHODS:

School food policy documents were identified by searching the federal government, and Departments of Health and Education websites of Australian jurisdictions. The L'Abbé framework for monitoring and evaluation of nutrition policies guided the data analysis.

RESULTS:

Eleven policies/guidelines from Australian national and state/territory governments were reviewed in 2023. Four state/territory policies had major updates since 2020. The consistency of nutrition standards improved across five jurisdictions, although a common nutrient classification system would have allowed better comparison. Implementation guides/tools and supporting resources were provided in all policies although their comprehensiveness varied. Policy monitoring and evaluation guide/tools, and local food procurement were incorporated in two additional policies. School principals were responsible for policy implementation and schools for independent compliance monitoring.

CONCLUSION:

Continued improvement in monitoring and evaluation plans, policy review timelines, and support systems for schools is needed to enhance implementation and impact of school food policies. External stakeholder support may help school leadership in more effective policy implementation. SO WHAT? Limited progress in incorporating recommendations into current school food policies calls for additional support and strategies to enhance policy implementation and monitoring.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Health Promot J Austr Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Health Promot J Austr Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia