Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Compressive effect and collapse behavior of three different transsacral implants in sacral fragility fractures - a retrospective analysis of 106 cases.
Fischer, C; Klauke, F; Schenk, P; Bauerfeld, H; Kobbe, P; Mendel, T.
Affiliation
  • Fischer C; Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, Merseburger Strasse 165, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. christian.fischer@bergmannstrost.de.
  • Klauke F; Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Hospital Halle, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. christian.fischer@bergmannstrost.de.
  • Schenk P; Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, Merseburger Strasse 165, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
  • Bauerfeld H; Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Hospital Halle, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
  • Kobbe P; Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, Merseburger Strasse 165, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
  • Mendel T; Department of Science, Research and Education, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, 06112, Halle, Germany.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39190062
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The aim of this study were the retrospective evaluation of the compressive effect and complication rates of transsacral stabilization of osteoporosis-associated sacral fragility fractures in 106 patients using three different implants (6.0 mm sacral bar, n = 32; 7.3 mm screw, n = 26; 7.5 mm ISG-Rod System, n = 48) with regard to the image morphological and clinical-perioperative outcome.

METHODS:

For this purpose, the sacral width was determined preoperatively and postoperatively using multiplanar CT reconstructions and correlated with the measured bone density (HU). The results were compared with each other on an implant-specific basis.

RESULTS:

A significant compressive effect was found for all implants (6.0 mm sacral bar 7.1 ± 3.4 mm, 7.3 mm screw 6.9 ± 1.8 mm, 7.5 mm ISG-Rod System 8 ± 2.4 mm). No implant-specific difference in compression could be detected. Overall, the washers broke into the iliac cortex in 9% of cases. The subgroups did not differ significantly in this respect (6.0 mm sacral bar 4 [13%], 7.3 mm screw 1 [1%], 7.5 mm ISG-Rod System (5 [10%], p = 0.581). A correlation between the degree of osteoporosis and the compressive effect could not be demonstrated. Significant implant-specific differences were found in the incision-suture time, with only ø039 ± 013 h required for implantation of the 7.5 mm ISG Rod System (6.0 mm sacral bar ø109 ± 022 h, 7.3 mm screw ø055 ± 020 h). The fluoroscopy time was significantly lower with the 7.3 mm screw (ø057 ± 023 min) and the 7.5 mm ISG Rod System (ø042 ± 0017 min) than with the 6.0 mm sacral bar (ø136 ± 046 min).

CONCLUSION:

A significant compressive effect was demonstrated with all three implants. No implant-specific complications or surgical site complications were identified in either the overall cohort or the subgroups. The 7.5 mm ISG Rod System shows advantages with regard to the duration of surgery and fluoroscopy.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg / Eur. j. trauma emerg. surg / European journal of trauma and emergency surgery Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg / Eur. j. trauma emerg. surg / European journal of trauma and emergency surgery Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany