[The tilt-table test in assessing syncope of unknown origin: do differences exist between children and adults?]. / El test de basculación en la evaluación del síncope de origen desconocido: existen diferencias entre niños y adultos?

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the differences between children and adults in the results of head-up tilt test. This study sought to investigate the potential differences concerning a) the clinical profile and circumstances of spontaneous syncope; b) the overall diagnostic performance of the test, and c) the type of positive response obtained. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 31 children and 123 adults with unexplained syncope. If baseline test (tilting at 70 degrees for 30 min) resulted negative, it was repeated under isoprenaline low-dose infusion. RESULTS: There were no differences in either clinical profile, except for severe traumatism more frequent in adults (25% vs. 3% in children; p < 0.05), or overall diagnostic performance (39% in children vs. 33% in adults; p = NS). However, the way the test rendered positive (via basal tilting in 92% of children vs. 50% in adults; p < 0.05) and the rate of cardioinhibitory response (42% in children vs 8% in adults; p < 0.01) were significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In this study children, in contrast to adults, rarely have a positive response in tilting under isoprenaline infusion. They also present a much higher rate of cardio-inhibitory response than adults.