Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How did Tarasoff affect clinical practice?
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci ; (484): 70-85, 1986 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10276576
The Tarasoff decisions of the California Supreme Court in 1974 and 1976 held that psychotherapists could be held liable for failing to protect the victims of their potentially violent patients. Our survey of psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers in eight metropolitan areas showed that Californians were more likely to have heard of the case, to believe it required warning the likely victim, and actually to issue warnings in such cases than were psychotherapists from other jurisdictions. Therapists were more willing to take steps to protect victims in 1980 than in 1975, but willingness to warn increased more among Californians than among those in other states. We conclude that although Tarasoff has influenced therapists' attitudes and behavior more in California than elsewhere, the case has also affected psychotherapeutic practice nationally.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicoterapia / Violencia / Legislación Médica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci Año: 1986 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicoterapia / Violencia / Legislación Médica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci Año: 1986 Tipo del documento: Article