Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient attitudes toward physician financial incentives.
Pereira, A G; Pearson, S D.
Afiliación
  • Pereira AG; Center for Ethics in Managed Care, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA, USA.
Arch Intern Med ; 161(10): 1313-7, 2001 May 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11371260
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite concern about the impact of financial incentives on physician behavior, little is known about patients' attitudes toward these incentives.

OBJECTIVES:

To assess patient attitudes toward physician compensation models and to explore patient characteristics associated with these attitudes.

METHODS:

We mailed a survey to 2000 adult patients in a large New England health maintenance organization. We asked about their trust in their primary care physician; discomfort with compensation models of salary with withhold (salary), fee-for-service with withhold, and group capitation (capitation).

RESULTS:

One thousand one hundred twenty-five (56%) of the 2000 patients who responded expressed varying levels of discomfort with the proposed compensation models 16% for salary, 25% for fee-for-service with withhold, and 53% for capitation (P<.001). Patients who knew their primary care physician was paid through capitation did not report less trust in their primary care physician but still frequently expressed discomfort (46%) with capitation. Among all respondents, those who were younger, white, had better health, had a higher income, were more educated, and who lacked a very trusting relationship with a primary care physician were more likely to report discomfort with both capitation and fee-for-service with withhold. In multivariable analyses, discomfort with capitation was more common among white patients (odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-4.2), patients with incomes exceeding $20 000 (odds ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-6.1), and college-educated patients (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-2.7).

CONCLUSIONS:

Most patients were uncomfortable with 1 or more of the 3 common methods used to pay physicians. Discomfort was highest with capitation and was more likely among wealthier, well-educated, white patients. With capitation increasing nationally, patients' concerns should be considered in the design of compensation agreements.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pacientes / Relaciones Médico-Paciente / Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Capitación / Planes de Incentivos para los Médicos / Actitud / Sistemas Prepagos de Salud Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Arch Intern Med Año: 2001 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pacientes / Relaciones Médico-Paciente / Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Capitación / Planes de Incentivos para los Médicos / Actitud / Sistemas Prepagos de Salud Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Arch Intern Med Año: 2001 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos