Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immunological responses in women with human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16)-associated anogenital intraepithelial neoplasia induced by heterologous prime-boost HPV-16 oncogene vaccination.
Smyth, Lucy J C; Van Poelgeest, Mariëtte I E; Davidson, Emma J; Kwappenberg, Kitty M C; Burt, Debbie; Sehr, Peter; Pawlita, Michael; Man, Stephen; Hickling, Julian K; Fiander, Alison N; Tristram, Amanda; Kitchener, Henry C; Offringa, Rienk; Stern, Peter L; Van Der Burg, Sjoerd H.
Afiliación
  • Smyth LJ; Cancer Research UK Immunology Group, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Clin Cancer Res ; 10(9): 2954-61, 2004 May 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15131030
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose is to study the immunogenicity of heterologous prime-boost human papillomavirus (HPV) oncogene vaccination in patients with anogenital intraepithelial neoplasia (AGIN). EXPERIMENTAL

DESIGN:

Twenty-nine women with high-grade AGIN received three i.m. doses of TA-CIN (HPV-16 L2/E6/E7 protein) at four weekly intervals followed by a single dermal scarification of vaccinia HPV-16/18 E6/E7 and were followed up for 12 weeks. Immunity to HPV-16 was assessed by lymphoproliferation, IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT), and ELISA.

RESULTS:

The patient group significantly responded to TA-CIN and not to the control antigen HPV-6 L2/E7 at all postvaccination time points when compared with baseline responses (P < or = 0.05). Ten of the patients showed at least a 3-fold increase in TA-CIN-specific proliferation at one or more time points after vaccination. Comparison of stimulation with HPV-16 E6- or E7-GST fusion proteins showed that proliferative responses were biased to HPV-16 E6. This bias was also seen by IFN-gamma ELISPOT using overlapping peptides, with HPV-16 E6- or E7-specific T cells being detected in 9 and 2 patients, respectively. In addition, vaccination resulted in the induction of antibodies against the HPV-16 oncoproteins. Of the 6 clinical responders, 2 patients showed both a proliferative TA-CIN-specific response and an E6-specific IFN-gamma response, whereas 3 other patients displayed E6-specific reactivity only. Stable disease was recorded in 19 patients, 8 of whom showed a concomitant TA-CIN-specific proliferative and/or E6-specific T-cell response. Of the 4 progressors, 2 failed to make a T-cell response and 2 responded by either proliferation or E6 ELISPOT alone.

CONCLUSIONS:

The prime-boost regimen is immunogenic in AGIN patients (humoral and cellular immunity), but there is no simple relationship between induction of systemic HPV-16-specific immunity and clinical outcome. Other factors that may play a role in the eradication of long-term established AGIN lesions need to be determined to identify the patient group that would benefit from immunotherapy with the vaccines used in this study.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Ano / Papillomaviridae / Vacunas Virales / Infecciones por Papillomavirus / Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Cancer Res Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2004 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Ano / Papillomaviridae / Vacunas Virales / Infecciones por Papillomavirus / Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Cancer Res Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2004 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido