Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A method for extracting plant roots from soil which facilitates rapid sample processing without compromising measurement accuracy.
Metcalfe, D B; Williams, M; Aragão, L E O C; Da Costa, A C L; De Almeida, S S; Braga, A P; Gonçalves, P H L; De Athaydes, J; Junior, Silva; Malhi, Y; Meir, P.
Afiliación
  • Metcalfe DB; University of Edinburgh, School of Geosciences, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Williams M; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Aragão LEOC; University of Edinburgh, School of Geosciences, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Da Costa ACL; University of Oxford, Centre for the Environment, Oxford, UK.
  • De Almeida SS; Universidade Federal do Pará, Centro de Geociências, Belém, Brazil.
  • Braga AP; Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Coordenação de Botânica, Belém, Brazil.
  • Gonçalves PHL; Universidade Federal do Pará, Centro de Geociências, Belém, Brazil.
  • De Athaydes J; Universidade Federal do Pará, Centro de Geociências, Belém, Brazil.
  • Junior S; University of Edinburgh, School of Geosciences, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Malhi Y; Universidade Federal do Pará, Centro de Geociências, Belém, Brazil.
  • Meir P; University of Oxford, Centre for the Environment, Oxford, UK.
New Phytol ; 174(3): 697-703, 2007.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17447923
ABSTRACT
This study evaluates a novel method for extracting roots from soil samples and applies it to estimate standing crop root mass (+/- confidence intervals) in an eastern Amazon rainforest. Roots were manually extracted from soil cores over a period of 40 min, which was split into 10 min time intervals. The pattern of cumulative extraction over time was used to predict root extraction beyond 40 min. A maximum-likelihood approach was used to calculate confidence intervals. The temporal prediction method added 21-32% to initial estimates of standing crop root mass. According to predictions, complete manual root extraction from 18 samples would have taken c. 239 h, compared with 12 h using the prediction method. Uncertainties (percentage difference between mean, and 10th and 90th percentiles) introduced by the prediction method were small (12-15%), compared with uncertainties caused by spatial variation in root mass (72-191%, for nine samples per plot surveyed). This method provides a way of increasing the number of root samples processed per unit time, without compromising measurement accuracy.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Plantas / Suelo / Manejo de Especímenes / Raíces de Plantas Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies País/Región como asunto: America do sul Idioma: En Revista: New Phytol Asunto de la revista: BOTANICA Año: 2007 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Plantas / Suelo / Manejo de Especímenes / Raíces de Plantas Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies País/Región como asunto: America do sul Idioma: En Revista: New Phytol Asunto de la revista: BOTANICA Año: 2007 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido