Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial.
Oakeshott, Pippa; Kerry, Sally; Aghaizu, Adamma; Atherton, Helen; Hay, Sima; Taylor-Robinson, David; Simms, Ian; Hay, Phillip.
Afiliación
  • Oakeshott P; Division of Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London SW17 0RE. oakeshot@sgul.ac.uk
BMJ ; 340: c1642, 2010 Apr 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20378636
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether screening and treating women for chlamydial infection reduces the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease over the subsequent 12 months.

DESIGN:

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING:

Common rooms, lecture theatres, and student bars at universities and further education colleges in London.

PARTICIPANTS:

2529 sexually active female students, mean age 21 years (range 16-27). INTERVENTION Participants completed a questionnaire and provided self taken vaginal swabs, with follow-up after one year. Samples were randomly allocated to immediate testing and treatment for chlamydial infection, or storage and analysis after a year (deferred screening controls). MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Incidence of clinical pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months.

RESULTS:

Baseline prevalence of chlamydia was 5.4% (68/1254) in screened women and 5.9% (75/1265) in controls. 94% (2377/2529) of women were followed up after 12 months. The incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease was 1.3% (15/1191) in screened women compared with 1.9% (23/1186) in controls (relative risk 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 1.22). Seven of 74 control women (9.5%, 95% confidence interval 4.7% to 18.3%) who tested positive for chlamydial infection at baseline developed pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months compared with one of 63 (1.6%) screened women (relative risk 0.17, 0.03 to 1.01). However, most episodes of pelvic inflammatory disease occurred in women who tested negative for chlamydia at baseline (79%, 30/38). 22% (527/2377) of women reported being tested independently for chlamydia during the trial.

CONCLUSION:

Although some evidence suggests that screening for chlamydia reduces rates of pelvic inflammatory disease, especially in women with chlamydial infection at baseline, the effectiveness of a single chlamydia test in preventing pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months may have been overestimated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00115388.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones por Chlamydia / Chlamydia trachomatis / Tamizaje Masivo / Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones por Chlamydia / Chlamydia trachomatis / Tamizaje Masivo / Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article