Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term outcomes and clinical predictors for pacemaker-requiring bradyarrhythmias after cardiac transplantation: analysis of the UNOS/OPTN cardiac transplant database.
Cantillon, Daniel J; Tarakji, Khaldoun G; Hu, Tingfei; Hsu, Amy; Smedira, Nicholas G; Starling, Randall C; Wilkoff, Bruce L; Saliba, Walid I.
Afiliación
  • Cantillon DJ; Cardiovascular Medicine/Electrophysiology, Cleveland Clinic, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. cantild@ccf.org
Heart Rhythm ; 7(11): 1567-71, 2010 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20601151
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pacemaker-requiring bradyarrhythmias after cardiac transplantation are common, and rarely can lead to sudden cardiac death. Prior outcomes studies have been limited to single-center data.

OBJECTIVE:

This study sought to define the long-term outcomes and clinical predictors for pacemaker-requiring bradyarrhythmias in the cardiac transplant population.

METHODS:

This study used multivariable analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (UNOS/OPTN) database of sequential U.S. cardiac transplant recipients from 1997 to 2007 stratified by postoperative bradyarrhythmias requiring a pacemaker. The primary end point was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS:

Among 35,987 cardiac transplant recipients (age 46.1 ± 18.3 years, 76% male, 22% bicaval technique) with a follow-up of 6.3 ± 4.7 years, pacemaker-requiring bradyarrhythmias occurred in 3,940 patients (10.9%). Pacemaker recipients demonstrated improved survival (median 8.0 years vs. 5.2 years, P < .001), decreased 5-year mortality (13.8% vs. 17.7%, P < .001), and overall crude mortality (42.9% vs. 45.9%, P < .001). Multivariable propensity-score-adjusted analysis demonstrated improved survival among pacemaker recipients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80 to 0.88, P < .001) after adjustment for donor/recipient age, UNOS listing status, donor heart ischemic time, surgical technique, graft rejection, and other common comorbidities. The bicaval surgical technique was strongly protective against a postoperative pacemaker requirement (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.36, P < .001) in multivariable analysis. Among the other variables studied, only increasing donor age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.09, P < .001) and recipient age (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.12, P < .001) were associated with a permanent pacemaker requirement.

CONCLUSION:

Cardiac transplant recipients with pacemaker-requiring bradyarrhythmias have an excellent long-term prognosis. Increased mortality in the nonpacemaker group merits further investigation. Biatrial surgical technique and increasing donor/recipient age are associated with postoperative pacemaker requirement.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Bradicardia / Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial / Trasplante de Corazón Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Heart Rhythm Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Bradicardia / Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial / Trasplante de Corazón Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Heart Rhythm Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos