Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A single-arm pilot phase II study of gefitinib and irinotecan in children with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma.
Furman, Wayne L; McGregor, Lisa M; McCarville, M Beth; Onciu, Mihaela; Davidoff, Andrew M; Kovach, Sandy; Hawkins, Dana; McPherson, Valerie; Houghton, Peter J; Billups, Catherine A; Wu, Jianrong; Stewart, Clinton F; Santana, Victor M.
Afiliación
  • Furman WL; Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105, USA. wayne.furman@stjude.org
Invest New Drugs ; 30(4): 1660-70, 2012 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21796439
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gefitinib potently inhibits neuroblastoma proliferation in vitro, and the gefitinib/irinotecan combination shows greater than additive activity against neuroblastoma xenografts. This Phase II pilot study estimated the rate of response to two courses of intravenous irinotecan plus oral gefitinib in children with untreated high-risk neuroblastoma.

METHODS:

Two courses of irinotecan [15 mg/m(2)/day (daily ×5)×2] were combined with 12 daily doses of gefitinib (112.5 mg/m(2)/day). Response was assessed after 6 weeks. A response rate >55% was sought.

RESULTS:

Of the 23 children enrolled, 19 were evaluable for response. Median age at diagnosis was 3.1 years (range, 18 days-12.7 years). Most patients were older than 24 months (n = 20; 87%), male (n = 18; 78%), white (n = 16; 70%), had INSS 4 disease (n = 19; 83%), and had adrenal primary tumors (n = 18; 78%); nine patients (39%) had amplified tumor MYCN. The toxicity of gefitinib/irinotecan was mild and reversible (nausea, 5/20; diarrhea, 8/20; vomiting, 7/20). Five patients had partial responses; 9 others had a 23%-60% decrease in primary tumor volume and/or improved MIBG scans or decreased bone or bone marrow tumor burden. Median (range) systemic irinotecan exposure (AUC) was 283 ng/ml*hr (range, 163-890 ng/ml*hr) and 28 ng/ml*hr (3.6-297 ng/ml*hr) for the active metabolite, SN-38. No relation was observed between response and tumor expression of EGFR, MRP2-4, ABCG2, and Pgp.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although the gefitinib/irinotecan combination was very tolerable and induced responses, it was not sufficiently active to warrant further investigation. Initial investigational studies of this type can preclude the necessity for larger, longer, and costlier trials.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Quinazolinas / Camptotecina / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Neuroblastoma / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Idioma: En Revista: Invest New Drugs Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Quinazolinas / Camptotecina / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Neuroblastoma / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Idioma: En Revista: Invest New Drugs Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos