Survival analysis of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
; 210(2): 160.e1-160.e11, 2014 Feb.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-24176895
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to compare the survival of women with endometrial cancer managed by robotic- and laparoscopic-assisted surgery. STUDYDESIGN:
This was a retrospective study conducted at 2 academic centers. Primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and disease recurrence.RESULTS:
From 2003 through 2010, 415 women met the study criteria. A total of 183 women had robotic and 232 women had laparoscopic-assisted surgery. Both groups were comparable in age, body mass index, comorbid conditions, histology, surgical stage, tumor grade, total nodes retrieved, and adjuvant therapy. With a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 4-61 months) for the robotic and 58 months (range, 4-118 months) for the traditional laparoscopic group, there were no significant differences in survival (3-year survival 93.3% and 93.6%), DFS (3-year DFS 83.3% and 88.4%), and tumor recurrence (14.8% and 12.1%) for robotic and laparoscopic groups, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that surgery is not an independent prognostic factor of survival.CONCLUSION:
Robotic-assisted surgery yields equivalent oncologic outcomes when compared to traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial adenocarcinoma.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Robótica
/
Neoplasias Endometriales
/
Laparoscopía
/
Estadificación de Neoplasias
Tipo de estudio:
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
Límite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Año:
2014
Tipo del documento:
Article