Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of hoof angle on joint contact area in the equine metacarpophalangeal joint following simulated impact loading ex vivo.
McCarty, C A; Thomason, J J; Gordon, K; Hurtig, M; Bignell, W.
Afiliación
  • McCarty CA; Department of Biomedical Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Thomason JJ; Department of Biomedical Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Gordon K; Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Hurtig M; Department of Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Bignell W; Department of Biomedical Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Equine Vet J ; 47(6): 715-20, 2015 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25237779
ABSTRACT
REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY To add to the existing data on impact loading of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint as a precursor to assessing the potential role of impact in joint disease.

OBJECTIVES:

To examine the effect of impact loading on contact areas of the first phalanx (P1) and proximal sesamoids (PS) with the third metacarpal (McIII) under 3 hoof-strike conditions (toe-first, flat, heel-first). STUDY

DESIGN:

Randomised, repeated controlled experiment using cadaver material.

METHODS:

Eight cadaver limbs were subjected to randomised, repeated controlled trials where the hoof was struck by a pendulum impact machine (impact velocity 3.55 m/s) under 3 strike conditions. Data from pressure sensitive film placed over medial and lateral McIII condyles and lateromedially across the dorsal aspect of McIII were quantified total areas of P1 and PS contact (cm(2) ) at maximum recorded pressure; centroid locations of contact areas relative to the sagittal ridge (cm) and transverse ridge (cm) and dispersion of pixels (cm(4) ) for each McIII condyle (medial/lateral). The effect of the strike conditions on each variable were statistically tested using repeated-measures ANOVA (α = 0.05).

RESULTS:

Contact area between P1 and McIII condyles fell in well-defined areas bounded by the sagittal and transverse ridge, contact areas from PS were smaller and widely dispersed across McIII palmar border. Ratio of contact area of P1 to PS was 2.83 (P<0001). Hoof strike had no significant effect on contact area (P>0.54)

CONCLUSIONS:

Contact at impact (primarily from P1 and distally situated on McIII), contrasts with contact areas at midstance from both P1 and PS, symmetrically placed. Under impact, the greatest contact area was on the dorsal aspect of the medial condyle and coincides with the area subjected to the greatest increase in subchondral bone stiffening in joint disease.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pezuñas y Garras / Caballos / Articulaciones Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Equine Vet J Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pezuñas y Garras / Caballos / Articulaciones Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Equine Vet J Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá