Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Comparison of the whole breast target volume delineated according to surface marks, palpation and glandular tissue on CT images after breast-conserving surgery].
Xu, Min; Li, Jianbin; Liu, Shanshan; Wang, Suzhen; Wang, Wei; Li, Fengxiang; Liu, Tonghai; Yu, Jinming.
Afiliación
  • Xu M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Jinan 250117, China.
  • Li J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Jinan 250117, China. Email: lijianbin@msn.com.
  • Liu S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Jinan 250117, China.
  • Wang S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Jinan 250117, China.
  • Wang W; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Jinan 250117, China.
  • Li F; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Jinan 250117, China.
  • Liu T; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Jinan 250117, China.
  • Yu J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Jinan 250117, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi ; 36(9): 677-81, 2014 Sep.
Article en Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25564058
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the methods of delineating the whole breast target volume based on surface marks, palpation and glandular tissue on CT images, and to explore the contouring criteria after breast-conserving surgery.

METHODS:

In 15 patients with breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery, the whole breast target was delineated in 3D CT simulation images each by three different methods. The target volume delineated according to anatomical marks were named CTVan, according to breast palpation named CTVpa, and according to glandular mammary tissue showing by CT images named CTVgl. The volumes of CTVan, CTVpa and CTVgl, and the degree of inclusion (DI) and conformal index (CI) between the targets were measured.

RESULTS:

The mean volumes of CTVan, CTVpa and CTVgl were (792.23 ± 282.25) cm(3), (618.33 ± 295.90) cm(3) and (196.83 ± 117.62) cm(3), respectively. The differences among the three methods were statistically significant (P < 0.001). The difference between CTVan and CTVpa had no statistical significance (P = 0.08), and both the differences between CTVan and CTVgl, and between CTVpa and CTVgl had statistical significance (both P < 0.001). The CI between CTVan and CTVpa (0.644 ± 0.122) was significantly larger than the CI between CTVan and CTVgl (0.264 ± 0.108), and the CI between CTVpa and CTVgl (0.328 ± 0.115)(P < 0.001). The DI of CTVan to CTVpa was 0.709 ± 0.144,DI of CTVgl to CTVan was 0.994 ± 0.005 and DI of CTVgl to CTVpa was 0.989 ± 0.008. The differences of inner, outer, upper and lower boundaries of CTVpa and CTVan were (3.35 ± 7.23) mm, (5.57 ± 13.37) mm, (1.75 ± 11.62) mm, and (11.25 ± 4.07)mm, respectively. The cranial and medial boundaries had a negative correlation with CTVpa (P < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS:

The differences among the three methods in the delineation of whole breast target volume are statistically significant. The target volume delineated according to the glandular mammary tissue displayed by CT scan is significantly smaller than that by the other two methods. Combination of breast palpation and anatomical marks may be helpful in delineating the whole breast target volume is relatively reasonable at present.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mama / Neoplasias de la Mama / Mastectomía Segmentaria Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mama / Neoplasias de la Mama / Mastectomía Segmentaria Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China