Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk of stroke after chiropractic spinal manipulation in medicare B beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years with neck pain.
Whedon, James M; Song, Yunjie; Mackenzie, Todd A; Phillips, Reed B; Lukovits, Timothy G; Lurie, Jon D.
Afiliación
  • Whedon JM; Instructor, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Grantham, NH. Electronic address: james.m.whedon@hitchcock.org.
  • Song Y; Research Associate, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Grantham, NH.
  • Mackenzie TA; Associate Professor, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Grantham, NH.
  • Phillips RB; President Emeritus, Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA.
  • Lukovits TG; Associate Professor of Neurology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Grantham, NH.
  • Lurie JD; Associate Professor, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Grantham, NH.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 38(2): 93-101, 2015 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25596875
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to quantify risk of stroke after chiropractic spinal manipulation, as compared to evaluation by a primary care physician, for Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years with neck pain.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of a 100% sample of annualized Medicare claims data on 1 157 475 beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years with an office visit to either a chiropractor or primary care physician for neck pain. We compared hazard of vertebrobasilar stroke and any stroke at 7 and 30 days after office visit using a Cox proportional hazards model. We used direct adjusted survival curves to estimate cumulative probability of stroke up to 30 days for the 2 cohorts.

RESULTS:

The proportion of subjects with stroke of any type in the chiropractic cohort was 1.2 per 1000 at 7 days and 5.1 per 1000 at 30 days. In the primary care cohort, the proportion of subjects with stroke of any type was 1.4 per 1000 at 7 days and 2.8 per 1000 at 30 days. In the chiropractic cohort, the adjusted risk of stroke was significantly lower at 7 days as compared to the primary care cohort (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.45), but at 30 days, a slight elevation in risk was observed for the chiropractic cohort (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.19).

CONCLUSIONS:

Among Medicare B beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years with neck pain, incidence of vertebrobasilar stroke was extremely low. Small differences in risk between patients who saw a chiropractor and those who saw a primary care physician are probably not clinically significant.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor de Cuello / Manipulación Espinal / Accidente Cerebrovascular / Manipulación Quiropráctica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor de Cuello / Manipulación Espinal / Accidente Cerebrovascular / Manipulación Quiropráctica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article