Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shoulder position increases ulnar nerve strain at the elbow of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome.
Ochi, Kensuke; Horiuchi, Yukio; Horiuchi, Koichi; Iwamoto, Takuji; Morisawa, Yasushi; Sato, Kazuki.
Afiliación
  • Ochi K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kawasaki Municipal Kawasaki Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku,
  • Horiuchi Y; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kawasaki Municipal Kawasaki Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Horiuchi K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kawasaki Municipal Kawasaki Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Iwamoto T; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Morisawa Y; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital, Wako, Saitama, Japan.
  • Sato K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 24(9): 1380-5, 2015 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25769906
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the shoulder internal rotation elbow flexion (SIREF) test, which is a modified elbow flexion (EF) test, has significantly higher sensitivity than the EF test in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome (CubTS). Here, we hypothesized that this increase in sensitivity was due to increase in the ulnar nerve strain around the elbow introduced by the additional shoulder position. METHODS: Ulnar nerve strain at the elbow was intraoperatively measured at both the EF test and SIREF test positions in 20 patients with CubTS before simple decompression. Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test at a confidence level of 99% (P < .001). RESULTS: Mean ulnar nerve strain in the EF test position was 18.9% ± 12.1%, whereas that in the SIREF test position was 24.7% ± 14.0%. Ulnar nerve strain was higher in the SIREF than in the EF test position in all cases, and the difference was significant (mean, 5.8% ± 0.9%; 95% confidence interval, 3.90%-7.73%). CONCLUSION: This study indicated that increased sensitivity in the SIREF test compared with the EF test was due to the increase in ulnar nerve strain around the elbow. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study showing that shoulder position changes the ulnar nerve strain around the elbow in living patients with CubTS.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Articulación del Hombro / Esguinces y Distensiones / Nervio Cubital / Síndrome del Túnel Cubital / Codo Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Articulación del Hombro / Esguinces y Distensiones / Nervio Cubital / Síndrome del Túnel Cubital / Codo Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article