Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of various treatment modalities in sleep bruxism.
Singh, Punit Kumar; Alvi, Habib A; Singh, Balendra Pratap; Singh, Raghuwar D; Kant, Surya; Jurel, Sunit; Singh, Kamleshwar; Arya, Deeksha; Dubey, Abhishek.
Afiliación
  • Singh PK; Junior Resident, Department of Prosthodontics, King George's Medical University UP, Lucknow, India.
  • Alvi HA; Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, King George's Medical University UP, Lucknow, India.
  • Singh BP; Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, King George's Medical University UP, Lucknow, India. Electronic address: balendra02@yahoo.com.
  • Singh RD; Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, King George's Medical University UP, Lucknow, India.
  • Kant S; Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, King George's Medical University UP, Lucknow, India.
  • Jurel S; Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, King George's Medical University UP, Lucknow, India.
  • Singh K; Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, King George's Medical University UP, Lucknow, India.
  • Arya D; Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, King George's Medical University UP, Lucknow, India.
  • Dubey A; Senior Research Fellow, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
J Prosthet Dent ; 114(3): 426-31, 2015 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26004173
ABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF

PROBLEM:

Sleep bruxism (SB) is an oral condition that is associated with tooth wear, orofacial pain, and interference with sleep. The most recommended management technique is the use of an occlusal splint. Although the mandibular advancement device (MAD) has shown good results, few well-designed randomized controlled trials are available with which to compare these treatment options. Therefore, an evaluation of the effect of these 2 appliances on SB is needed.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a MAD and a maxillary occlusal splint (MOS) on the sleep quality and SB activity of participants with SB. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

In this randomized controlled trial, 28 participants were randomly supplied with either a MAD or MOS. The sleep quality of the participants was evaluated with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and their SB activity with electromyographic activity of the masseter with polysomnography. These variables were measured at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months.

RESULTS:

Of 32 participants, 28 had data available for statistical analysis, as 4 participants did not return for follow-up examination. Both the MOS and MAD significantly reduced the PSQI and SB episodes and bursts in participants after 3 months (P<.05). The MAD provided greater reduction in SB episodes per hour after 3 months compared to the MOS. Participants supplied with a MAD reported more discomfort in their feedback form than participants using a MOS.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both the MAD and MOS provided significantly improved sleep quality and a decrease in SB episodes at 3 months.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Avance Mandibular / Bruxismo del Sueño Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Avance Mandibular / Bruxismo del Sueño Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India