Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Correlation between the ABC classification and radiological findings for assessing gastric cancer risk.
Itoh, Takahiro; Saito, Miho; Marugami, Nagaaki; Hirai, Toshiko; Marugami, Aki; Takahama, Junko; Tanaka, Toshihiro; Kichikawa, Kimihiko.
Afiliación
  • Itoh T; Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijocho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan. titoh@naramed-u.ac.jp.
  • Saito M; Department of Endoscopy and Ultrasound, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijocho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
  • Marugami N; Department of Endoscopy and Ultrasound, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijocho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
  • Hirai T; Department of Endoscopy and Ultrasound, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijocho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
  • Marugami A; Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijocho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
  • Takahama J; Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijocho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
  • Tanaka T; Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijocho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
  • Kichikawa K; Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijocho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Jpn J Radiol ; 33(10): 636-44, 2015 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26251239
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate the correlation between ABC risk assessment and radiological findings of gastric mucosa and to propose an improved method for gastric cancer screening. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We evaluated 318 participants with Helicobacter pylori (Hp) antibody titers, serum pepsinogen (PG) and upper GI radiography and then classified them into three groups A, double-negative; B, Hp-positive, PG-negative; C, PG-positive. Group A was subclassified as A-1, Hp antibody titer <3.0 U/ml; A-2, Hp antibody titer ≥3.0 U/ml. Results for group A and non-A (B or C) participants and radiological findings of gastric mucosa (fold and area gastricae) were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS:

Radiological findings differed significantly between the 207 A-1 and 98 non-A group. Odds ratios were 17.72 for fold distribution, 10.63 for fold thickness, 6.10 for fold characteristics, and 10.62 for area gastricae. Presence of ≥2 risk factors offered 90.3 % sensitivity, 94.7 % specificity, and 93.3 % accuracy. Nine (69.2 %) of the 13 A-2 group participants and 11 (5.3 %) A-1 group participants had a risk for gastric cancer according to radiological findings.

CONCLUSION:

A good correlation exists between ABC classifications and radiological findings for gastric cancer risk, but some discrepant cases exist. We recommend both methods as screening for gastric cancer.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Detección Precoz del Cáncer / Mucosa Gástrica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Jpn J Radiol Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / RADIOLOGIA / RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Detección Precoz del Cáncer / Mucosa Gástrica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Jpn J Radiol Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / RADIOLOGIA / RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón