Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease.
Ellis, Stephen G; Kereiakes, Dean J; Metzger, D Christopher; Caputo, Ronald P; Rizik, David G; Teirstein, Paul S; Litt, Marc R; Kini, Annapoorna; Kabour, Ameer; Marx, Steven O; Popma, Jeffrey J; McGreevy, Robert; Zhang, Zhen; Simonton, Charles; Stone, Gregg W.
Afiliación
  • Ellis SG; From Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (S.G.E.), the Christ Hospital, Heart and Vascular Center, Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati (D.J.K.), and Mercy St. Vincent's Medical Center, Toledo (A. Kini) - all in Ohio; Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (D.C.M.); St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Liverpool, NY (R.P.C.); Scottsdale Healthcare, Scottsdale, AZ (D.G.R.); Scripps Clinic, La Jolla (P.S.T.), and Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara (R.M., Z.Z., C.S.) - both in California; Baptist M
N Engl J Med ; 373(20): 1905-15, 2015 Nov 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26457558
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In patients with coronary artery disease who receive metallic drug-eluting coronary stents, adverse events such as late target-lesion failure may be related in part to the persistent presence of the metallic stent frame in the coronary-vessel wall. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds have been developed to attempt to improve long-term outcomes.

METHODS:

In this large, multicenter, randomized trial, 2008 patients with stable or unstable angina were randomly assigned in a 21 ratio to receive an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular (Absorb) scaffold (1322 patients) or an everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium (Xience) stent (686 patients). The primary end point, which was tested for both noninferiority (margin, 4.5 percentage points for the risk difference) and superiority, was target-lesion failure (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization) at 1 year.

RESULTS:

Target-lesion failure at 1 year occurred in 7.8% of patients in the Absorb group and in 6.1% of patients in the Xience group (difference, 1.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -0.5 to 3.9; P=0.007 for noninferiority and P=0.16 for superiority). There was no significant difference between the Absorb group and the Xience group in rates of cardiac death (0.6% and 0.1%, respectively; P=0.29), target-vessel myocardial infarction (6.0% and 4.6%, respectively; P=0.18), or ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization (3.0% and 2.5%, respectively; P=0.50). Device thrombosis within 1 year occurred in 1.5% of patients in the Absorb group and in 0.7% of patients in the Xience group (P=0.13).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this large-scale, randomized trial, treatment of noncomplex obstructive coronary artery disease with an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold, as compared with an everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stent, was within the prespecified margin for noninferiority with respect to target-lesion failure at 1 year. (Funded by Abbott Vascular; ABSORB III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01751906.).
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Implantes Absorbibles / Stents Liberadores de Fármacos / Everolimus / Inmunosupresores Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: N Engl J Med Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Implantes Absorbibles / Stents Liberadores de Fármacos / Everolimus / Inmunosupresores Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: N Engl J Med Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article