Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do active design buildings change health behaviour and workplace perceptions?
Engelen, L; Dhillon, H M; Chau, J Y; Hespe, D; Bauman, A E.
Afiliación
  • Engelen L; Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia, lina.engelen@sydney.edu.au.
  • Dhillon HM; Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
  • Chau JY; Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
  • Hespe D; Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
  • Bauman AE; Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 66(5): 408-11, 2016 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26769894
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Occupying new, active design office buildings designed for health promotion and connectivity provides an opportunity to evaluate indoor environment effects on healthy behaviour, sedentariness and workplace perceptions.

AIMS:

To determine if moving to a health-promoting building changed workplace physical activity, sedentary behaviour, workplace perceptions and productivity.

METHODS:

Participants from four locations at the University of Sydney, Australia, relocated into a new active design building. After consent, participants completed an online questionnaire 2 months before moving and 2 months after. Questions related to health behaviours (physical activity and sitting time), musculoskeletal issues, perceptions of the office environment, productivity and engagement.

RESULTS:

There were 34 participants (60% aged 25-45, 78% female, 84% employed full-time); 21 participants provided complete data. Results showed that after the move participants spent less work time sitting (83-70%; P < 0.01) and more time standing (9-21%; P < 0.01), while walking time remained unchanged. Participants reported less low back pain (P < 0.01). Sixty per cent of participants in the new workplace were in an open-plan office, compared to 16% before moving. Participants perceived the new work environment as more stimulating, better lit and ventilated, but noisier and providing less storage. No difference was reported in daily physical activity, number of stairs climbed or productivity.

CONCLUSIONS:

Moving to an active design building appeared to have physical health-promoting effects on workers, but workers' perceptions about the new work environment varied. These results will inform future studies in other new buildings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Percepción / Arquitectura / Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud / Lugar de Trabajo Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Occup Med (Lond) Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Percepción / Arquitectura / Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud / Lugar de Trabajo Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Occup Med (Lond) Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article