Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A multi-national report on stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastases: Patient selection and follow-up.
Dagan, Roi; Lo, Simon S; Redmond, Kristin J; Poon, Ian; Foote, Matthew C; Lohr, Frank; Ricardi, Umberto; Sahgal, Arjun.
Afiliación
  • Dagan R; a University of Florida , Jacksonville , Florida, USA ;
  • Lo SS; b University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center , Cleveland , Ohio , USA ;
  • Redmond KJ; c Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , Maryland , USA ;
  • Poon I; d Odette Cancer Centre-Sunnybrook Health Sciences , Toronto , Ontario , Canada ;
  • Foote MC; e University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital , Woolloongabba , Queensland , Australia ;
  • Lohr F; f University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg , Mannheim , Germany ;
  • Ricardi U; g Department of Oncology , University of Turin , Turin , Italy ;
  • Sahgal A; h Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Acta Oncol ; 55(5): 633-7, 2016 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27046290
ABSTRACT
Aims Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligometastases is increasingly used with few evidenced-based guidelines. We conducted a survey to determine patient selection and follow-up practice patterns. Materials and methods Seven institutions from US, Canada, Europe, and Australia that recommend SBRT for oligometastases participated in a 72-item survey. Levels of agreement were categorized as strong (6-7 common responses), moderate (4-5), low (2-3), or no agreement. Results There was strong agreement for recommending SBRT for eradication of all detectable oligometastases with most members limiting the number of metastases to five (range 2-5) and three within a single organ (range 2-5). There was moderate agreement for recommending SBRT as consolidative therapy after systemic therapy. There was strong agreement for requiring adequate performance status and no concurrent chemotherapy. Additional areas of strong agreement included staging evaluations, primary diagnosis, target sites, and follow-up recommendations. Several differences emerged, including the use of SBRT for sarcoma oligometastases, treatment response evaluation, and which imaging should be performed during follow-up. Conclusion Significant commonalities and variations exist for patient selection and follow-up recommendations for SBRT for oligometastases. Information from this survey may serve to help clarify the current landscape.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiocirugia / Selección de Paciente / Metástasis de la Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte / Europa / Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Acta Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiocirugia / Selección de Paciente / Metástasis de la Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte / Europa / Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Acta Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article