Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of National Institutes of Health Gastrointestinal PROMIS Measures in Clinical Practice: Results of a Multicenter Controlled Trial.
Almario, Christopher V; Chey, William D; Khanna, Dinesh; Mosadeghi, Sasan; Ahmed, Shahzad; Afghani, Elham; Whitman, Cynthia; Fuller, Garth; Reid, Mark; Bolus, Roger; Dennis, Buddy; Encarnacion, Rey; Martinez, Bibiana; Soares, Jennifer; Modi, Rushaba; Agarwal, Nikhil; Lee, Aaron; Kubomoto, Scott; Sharma, Gobind; Bolus, Sally; Spiegel, Brennan M R.
Afiliación
  • Almario CV; Division of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Chey WD; Division of Gastroenterology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Khanna D; Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Mosadeghi S; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Ahmed S; Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Afghani E; Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Whitman C; Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Fuller G; Division of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Reid M; Division of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Bolus R; Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Dennis B; Division of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Encarnacion R; Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Martinez B; Division of Gastroenterology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Soares J; Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Modi R; Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Agarwal N; UCLA Computing Technology Research Laboratory (CTRL), Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Lee A; UCLA Computing Technology Research Laboratory (CTRL), Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Kubomoto S; Division of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Sharma G; Division of Gastroenterology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Bolus S; Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Spiegel BM; Division of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 111(11): 1546-1556, 2016 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27481311
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) created the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to allow efficient, online measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), but it remains untested whether PROMIS improves outcomes. Here, we aimed to compare the impact of gastrointestinal (GI) PROMIS measures vs. usual care on patient outcomes.

METHODS:

We performed a pragmatic clinical trial with an off-on study design alternating weekly between intervention (GI PROMIS) and control arms at one Veterans Affairs and three university-affiliated specialty clinics. Adults with GI symptoms were eligible. Intervention patients completed GI PROMIS symptom questionnaires on an e-portal 1 week before their visit; PROs were available for review by patients and their providers before and during the clinic visit. Usual care patients were managed according to customary practices. Our primary outcome was patient satisfaction as determined by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included provider interpersonal skills (Doctors' Interpersonal Skills Questionnaire (DISQ)) and shared decision-making (9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)).

RESULTS:

There were 217 and 154 patients in the GI PROMIS and control arms, respectively. Patient satisfaction was similar between groups (P>0.05). Intervention patients had similar assessments of their providers' interpersonal skills (DISQ 89.4±11.7 vs. 89.8±16.0, P=0.79) and shared decision-making (SDM-Q-9 79.3±12.4 vs. 79.0±22.0, P=0.85) vs.

CONCLUSIONS:

This is the first controlled trial examining the impact of NIH PROMIS in clinical practice. One-time use of GI PROMIS did not improve patient satisfaction or assessment of provider interpersonal skills and shared decision-making. Future studies examining how to optimize PROs in clinical practice are encouraged before widespread adoption.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Relaciones Médico-Paciente / Satisfacción del Paciente / Toma de Decisiones / Portales del Paciente / Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente / Gastroenterología / Enfermedades Gastrointestinales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Gastroenterol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Relaciones Médico-Paciente / Satisfacción del Paciente / Toma de Decisiones / Portales del Paciente / Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente / Gastroenterología / Enfermedades Gastrointestinales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Gastroenterol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos