Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of Giving Information on Personalized Genomic Risk of Melanoma to the Public.
Smit, Amelia K; Espinoza, David; Newson, Ainsley J; Morton, Rachael L; Fenton, Georgina; Freeman, Lucinda; Dunlop, Kate; Butow, Phyllis N; Law, Matthew H; Kimlin, Michael G; Keogh, Louise A; Dobbinson, Suzanne J; Kirk, Judy; Kanetsky, Peter A; Mann, Graham J; Cust, Anne E.
Afiliación
  • Smit AK; Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Espinoza D; NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Newson AJ; Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Morton RL; NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Fenton G; Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Freeman L; The Centre for Genetics Education, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.
  • Dunlop K; Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Butow PN; The Centre for Genetics Education, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.
  • Law MH; The Centre for Genetics Education, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.
  • Kimlin MG; Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Keogh LA; Statistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Dobbinson SJ; The University of the Sunshine Coast and Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Kirk J; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
  • Kanetsky PA; Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Mann GJ; Westmead Clinical School, and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Cust AE; Cancer Epidemiology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 26(2): 212-221, 2017 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27702805
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Communication of personalized melanoma genomic risk information may improve melanoma prevention behaviors.

METHODS:

We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of communicating personalized genomic risk of melanoma to the public and its preliminary impact on behaviors and psychosocial outcomes. One hundred eighteen people aged 22 to 69 years provided a saliva sample and were randomized to the control (nonpersonalized educational materials) or intervention (personalized booklet presenting melanoma genomic risk as absolute and relative risks and a risk category based on variants in 21 genes, telephone-based genetic counseling, and nonpersonalized educational materials). Intention-to-treat analyses overall and by-risk category were conducted using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values.

RESULTS:

Consent to participate was 41%, 99% were successfully genotyped, and 92% completed 3-month follow-up. Intervention participants reported high satisfaction with the personalized booklet (mean = 8.6, SD = 1.6; on a 0-10 scale) and genetic counseling (mean = 8.1, SD = 2.2). No significant behavioral effects at 3-month follow-up were identified between intervention and control groups overall objectively measured standard erythemal doses per day [-16%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -43% to 24%] and sun protection index (0.05; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.18). There was increased confidence identifying melanoma at 3 months (0.40; 95% CI, 0.10-0.69). Stratified by risk category, effect sizes for intentional tanning and some individual sun protection items appeared stronger for the average-risk group. There were no appreciable group differences in skin cancer-related worry or psychologic distress.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results demonstrate feasibility and acceptability of providing personalized genomic risk of melanoma to the public. IMPACT Genomic risk information has potential as a melanoma prevention strategy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(2); 212-21. ©2016 AACR.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Pruebas Genéticas / Educación del Paciente como Asunto / Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad / Asesoramiento Genético / Consentimiento Informado / Melanoma Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Asunto de la revista: BIOQUIMICA / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Pruebas Genéticas / Educación del Paciente como Asunto / Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad / Asesoramiento Genético / Consentimiento Informado / Melanoma Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Asunto de la revista: BIOQUIMICA / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia