Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Delphinid echolocation click detection probability on near-seafloor sensors.
Frasier, Kaitlin E; Wiggins, Sean M; Harris, Danielle; Marques, Tiago A; Thomas, Len; Hildebrand, John A.
Afiliación
  • Frasier KE; Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0205, USA.
  • Wiggins SM; Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0205, USA.
  • Harris D; Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St Andrews, The Observatory, Buchanan Gardens, Fife KY16 9LZ, United Kingdom.
  • Marques TA; Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St Andrews, The Observatory, Buchanan Gardens, Fife KY16 9LZ, United Kingdom.
  • Thomas L; Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St Andrews, The Observatory, Buchanan Gardens, Fife KY16 9LZ, United Kingdom.
  • Hildebrand JA; Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0205, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 140(3): 1918, 2016 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27914405
ABSTRACT
The probability of detecting echolocating delphinids on a near-seafloor sensor was estimated using two Monte Carlo simulation methods. One method estimated the probability of detecting a single click (cue counting); the other estimated the probability of detecting a group of delphinids (group counting). Echolocation click beam pattern and source level assumptions strongly influenced detectability predictions by the cue counting model. Group detectability was also influenced by assumptions about group behaviors. Model results were compared to in situ recordings of encounters with Risso's dolphin (Grampus griseus) and presumed pantropical spotted dolphin (Stenella attenuata) from a near-seafloor four-channel tracking sensor deployed in the Gulf of Mexico (25.537°N 84.632°W, depth 1220 m). Horizontal detection range, received level and estimated source level distributions from localized encounters were compared with the model predictions. Agreement between in situ results and model predictions suggests that simulations can be used to estimate detection probabilities when direct distance estimation is not available.
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Acoust Soc Am Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Acoust Soc Am Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos