Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-Term Effects of Repeated Injections of Local Anesthetic With or Without Corticosteroid for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Trial.
Friedly, Janna L; Comstock, Bryan A; Turner, Judith A; Heagerty, Patrick J; Deyo, Richard A; Bauer, Zoya; Avins, Andrew L; Nedeljkovic, Srdjan S; Nerenz, David R; Shi, Xu Rita; Annaswamy, Thiru; Standaert, Christopher J; Smuck, Matthew; Kennedy, David J; Akuthota, Venu; Sibell, David; Wasan, Ajay D; Diehn, Felix; Suri, Pradeep; Rundell, Sean D; Kessler, Larry; Chen, Allen S; Jarvik, Jeffrey G.
Afiliación
  • Friedly JL; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: friedlyj@uw.edu.
  • Comstock BA; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Turner JA; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Heagerty PJ; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Deyo RA; Departments of Family Medicine and Internal Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR; Center for Research in Occupational and Environmental Toxicology, Oregon Health and Scien
  • Bauer Z; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Avins AL; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
  • Nedeljkovic SS; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Spine Unit, Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Boston, MA.
  • Nerenz DR; Neuroscience Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
  • Shi XR; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Annaswamy T; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service, VA North Texas Health Care System, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Standaert CJ; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Smuck M; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Stanford University Medical Center, Redwood City, CA.
  • Kennedy DJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Stanford University Medical Center, Redwood City, CA.
  • Akuthota V; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
  • Sibell D; Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
  • Wasan AD; Department of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Diehn F; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Suri P; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA.
  • Rundell SD; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Kessler L; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Chen AS; Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
  • Jarvik JG; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 98(8): 1499-1507.e2, 2017 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28396242
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the overall long-term effectiveness of treatment with epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbar central spinal stenosis and the effect of repeat injections, including crossover injections, on outcomes through 12 months.

DESIGN:

Multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing epidural injections of corticosteroid plus lidocaine versus lidocaine alone.

SETTING:

Sixteen clinical sites.

PARTICIPANTS:

Participants with imaging-confirmed lumbar central spinal stenosis (N=400).

INTERVENTIONS:

Participants were randomized to receive either epidural injections with corticosteroid plus lidocaine or lidocaine alone with the option of blinded crossover after 6 weeks to receive the alternate treatment. Participants could receive 1 to 2 injections from 0 to 6 weeks and up to 2 injections from 6 to 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, participants received usual care. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Primary outcomes were the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) (range, 0-24, where higher scores indicate greater disability) and leg pain intensity (range, 0 [no pain] to 10 [pain as bad as you can imagine]). Secondary outcomes included opioid use, spine surgery, and crossover rates.

RESULTS:

At 12 months, both treatment groups maintained initial observed improvements, with no significant differences between groups on the RDQ (adjusted mean difference, -0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.6 to 0.9; P=.55), leg pain (adjusted mean difference, 0.1; 95% CI, -0.5 to 0.7; P=.75), opioid use (corticosteroid plus lidocaine 41.4% vs lidocaine alone 36.3%; P=.41), or spine surgery (corticosteroid plus lidocaine 16.8% vs lidocaine alone 11.8%; P=.22). Fewer participants randomized to corticosteroid plus lidocaine (30%, n=60) versus lidocaine alone (45%, n=90) crossed over after 6 weeks (P=.003). Among participants who crossed over at 6 weeks, the 6- to 12-week RDQ change did not differ between the 2 randomized treatment groups (adjusted mean difference, -1.0; 95% CI, -2.6 to 0.7; P=.24). In both groups, participants crossing over at 6 weeks had worse 12-month trajectories compared with participants who did not choose to crossover.

CONCLUSIONS:

For lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms, epidural injections of corticosteroid plus lidocaine offered no benefits from 6 weeks to 12 months beyond that of injections of lidocaine alone in terms of self-reported pain and function or reduction in use of opioids and spine surgery. In patients with improved pain and function 6 weeks after initial injection, these outcomes were maintained at 12 months. However, the trajectories of pain and function outcomes after 3 weeks did not differ by injectate type. Repeated injections of either type offered no additional long-term benefit if injections in the first 6 weeks did not improve pain.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estenosis Espinal / Corticoesteroides / Anestésicos Locales / Lidocaína / Vértebras Lumbares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estenosis Espinal / Corticoesteroides / Anestésicos Locales / Lidocaína / Vértebras Lumbares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article