Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Type of Forage Substrate Preparation Included as Substrate in a RUSITEC System Affects the Ruminal Microbiota and Fermentation Characteristics.
Duarte, Andrea C; Holman, Devin B; Alexander, Trevor W; Durmic, Zoey; Vercoe, Philip E; Chaves, Alexandre V.
Afiliación
  • Duarte AC; Faculty of Veterinary Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, SydneyNSW, Australia.
  • Holman DB; Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, LethbridgeAB, Canada.
  • Alexander TW; Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, LethbridgeAB, Canada.
  • Durmic Z; The University of Western Australia, School of Agriculture and Environment, CrawleyWA, Australia.
  • Vercoe PE; The University of Western Australia, School of Agriculture and Environment, CrawleyWA, Australia.
  • Chaves AV; Faculty of Veterinary Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, SydneyNSW, Australia.
Front Microbiol ; 8: 704, 2017.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28473826
ABSTRACT
In vitro fermentation systems such as the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) are frequently used to assess dietary manipulations in livestock, thereby limiting the use of live animals. Despite being in use for nearly 40 years, improvements are continually sought in these systems to better reflect and mimic natural processes in ruminants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of forage preparation, i.e., frozen minced (FM) and freeze-dried and ground (FDG), on the ruminal microbiota and on fermentation characteristics when included as a substrate in a RUSITEC system. A completely randomized design experiment was performed over a 15-day period, with 7 days of adaptation and an 8-day experimental period. Fermentation parameters (total gas, CH4, and volatile fatty acid production) were analyzed on a daily basis over the experimental period and the archaeal and bacterial microbiota (liquid-associated microbes [LAM] and solid-associated microbes [SAM] was assessed at 0, 5, 10, and 15 days using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Results from this study suggested a tendency (P = 0.09) of FM treatment to increase daily CH4 (mg/d) production by 16.7% when compared with FDG treatment. Of the major volatile fatty acids (acetate, propionate, and butyrate), only butyrate production was greater (P = 0.01) with FM treatment compared with FDG substrate. The archaeal and bacterial diversity and richness did not differ between the forage preparations, although feed particle size of the forage had a significant effect on microbial community structure in the SAM and LAM samples. The Bacteroidetes phylum was more relatively abundant in the FM substrate treatment, while Proteobacteria was enriched in the FDG treatment. At the genus-level, Butyrivibrio, Prevotella, and Roseburia were enriched in the FM substrate treatment and Campylobacter and Lactobacillus in the FDG substrate treatment. Evidence from this study suggests that forage preparation affects CH4 production, butyrate production, and the structure of the rumen microbiota during in vitro fermentation.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Front Microbiol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Front Microbiol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia