Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The role of oral methotrexate as a steroid sparing agent in refractory eosinophilic asthma.
Bilocca, David; Hargadon, B; Pavord, I D; Green, R H; Brightling, C E; Bradding, P; Wardlaw, A J; Martin, N; Murphy, A C; Siddiqui, S.
Afiliación
  • Bilocca D; 1 Institute for Lung Health, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester National Health Service Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Hargadon B; 2 Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Pavord ID; 1 Institute for Lung Health, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester National Health Service Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Green RH; 2 Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Brightling CE; 3 NDM Research Building, Oxford University, UK.
  • Bradding P; 1 Institute for Lung Health, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester National Health Service Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Wardlaw AJ; 2 Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Martin N; 1 Institute for Lung Health, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester National Health Service Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Murphy AC; 2 Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Siddiqui S; 1 Institute for Lung Health, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester National Health Service Trust, Leicester, UK.
Chron Respir Dis ; 15(1): 85-87, 2018 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28569072
ABSTRACT
The use of oral methotrexate for refractory eosinophilic asthma in a tertiary asthma referral centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, was evaluated between January 2006 and December 2014. The patients ( n = 61) were carefully phenotyped at baseline with markers of airway inflammation. In addition, a structured oral methotrexate proforma was utilized to evaluate response to therapy and adverse events. Oral steroid withdrawal was attempted 3 months after commencing treatment. Several outcomes were evaluated at 12 months, including both efficacy and adverse effects; 15% ( n = 9/61) responded by achieving a decrease in daily oral corticosteroid dose (mean 8.43 (±8.76) mg), although we were unable to identify factors that predicted a treatment response. There were no other significant changes in any other clinical outcome measures. There was a high rate of adverse events (19/61 (31%)), primarily gastrointestinal/hepatitis. Our findings support the use of biological agents in preference to using oral methotrexate as a steroid sparing agent at the first instance. In the event of failure of these agents, oral methotrexate remains a therapeutic option, which can be considered in highly specialist severe asthma centres.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Metotrexato / Eosinofilia / Inmunosupresores Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Chron Respir Dis Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Metotrexato / Eosinofilia / Inmunosupresores Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Chron Respir Dis Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido