Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bowel cancer screening is safe, detects earlier stage cancer and adenomas in 50% of cases: experience of the prevalent round of screening from two first wave centres in the North East of England.
Rajasekhar, P T; Clifford, G M; Lee, T J W; Rutter, M D; Waddup, G; Ritchie, M; Nylander, D; Painter, J; Singh, J; Ward, I; Dempsey, N; Bowes, J; Handley, G; Henry, J; Rees, C J.
Afiliación
  • Rajasekhar PT; South of Tyne Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, South Shields, UK.
  • Clifford GM; The Northern Region Endoscopy Group, South Shields, UK.
  • Lee TJW; South of Tyne Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, South Shields, UK.
  • Rutter MD; The Northern Region Endoscopy Group, South Shields, UK.
  • Waddup G; Tees Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, Stockon-on-Tees, UK.
  • Ritchie M; The Northern Region Endoscopy Group, South Shields, UK.
  • Nylander D; Tees Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, Stockon-on-Tees, UK.
  • Painter J; Tees Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, Stockon-on-Tees, UK.
  • Singh J; South of Tyne Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, South Shields, UK.
  • Ward I; South of Tyne Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, South Shields, UK.
  • Dempsey N; The Northern Region Endoscopy Group, South Shields, UK.
  • Bowes J; South of Tyne Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, South Shields, UK.
  • Handley G; The Northern Region Endoscopy Group, South Shields, UK.
  • Henry J; South of Tyne Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, South Shields, UK.
  • Rees CJ; The Northern Region Endoscopy Group, South Shields, UK.
Frontline Gastroenterol ; 3(1): 10-15, 2012 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28839624
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) began roll-out in 2006 aiming to reduce cancer mortality through detection at an earlier stage. We report results from the prevalent round of screening at two first wave centres and compare with the UK pilot study.

DESIGN:

This is a service evaluation study. Data were collected prospectively for all individuals undergoing faecal occult blood testing (FOBt) and colonoscopy including uptake and outcomes of FOBt, colonoscopic performance, findings, histological data and complications. Continuous data were compared using a two-tailed test of two proportions.

SETTING:

The South of Tyne and Tees Bowel Cancer Screening centres. PATIENTS Participants of the BCSP. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

1) Colonoscopy Quality Assurance and 2) Cancer stage shift.

RESULTS:

195,772 individuals were invited to participate. Uptake was 54% and FOBt positivity 1.7%. 1524 underwent colonoscopy with caecal intubation in 1485 (97%). 180 (12%) cancers were detected. Dukes stages were 76 (42%) A; 47 (26%) B; 47 (26%) C; 8 (4%) D and 2 (1%) unknown. This demonstrates a significantly earlier stage at diagnosis compared with data from 2867 non-screening detected cancers (p<0.001). Adenomas were detected in 758 (50%). One perforation occurred (0.07%) and two intermediate bleeds requiring transfusion only (0.12%). Both caecal intubation and adenoma detection were significantly higher than in the UK pilot study (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The prevalent round of screening demonstrates a high adenoma and cancer detection rate and significantly earlier stage at diagnosis. Complications were few providing reassurance regarding safety. Efforts are required to improve uptake.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Frontline Gastroenterol Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Frontline Gastroenterol Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido