Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimal important difference of target lobar volume reduction after endobronchial valve treatment for emphysema.
Welling, Jorrit B A; Hartman, Jorine E; van Rikxoort, Eva M; Ten Hacken, Nick H T; Kerstjens, Huib A M; Klooster, Karin; Slebos, Dirk-Jan.
Afiliación
  • Welling JBA; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Hartman JE; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • van Rikxoort EM; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Ten Hacken NHT; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Kerstjens HAM; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Klooster K; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Slebos DJ; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Respirology ; 23(3): 306-310, 2018 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28913877
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

Target lobar volume reduction (TLVR) is an important efficacy outcome measure for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) treatment using one-way endobronchial valves (EBV) in patients with severe emphysema. The commonly used cut-off value for TLVR that expresses a perceivable clinical benefit is -350 mL. However, a scientifically determined minimal important difference (MID) for TLVR never has been published. The objective of the present study was to determine the MID for TLVR on HRCT in patients who were treated with EBV.

METHODS:

A total of 318 patients with severe emphysema from two BLVR trials were analysed. Anchor-based methods were used to define the TLVR MID at 6 months follow-up. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ), residual volume (RV) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were used as anchors.

RESULTS:

The calculated TLVR MID with each anchor was FEV1 -587 mL, RV -534 mL and SGRQ -560 mL. The combined MID (average of the three anchor-based MIDs) was -563 mL.

CONCLUSION:

Using the anchor-based method, we established a TLVR MID of -563 mL in patients with severe emphysema at 6 months follow-up after EBV treatment. This value can be useful for both interpreting the results from trials and clinical practice, as well as for designing future studies on lung volume reduction.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumonectomía / Prótesis e Implantes / Enfisema Pulmonar / Broncoscopía Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Respirology Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumonectomía / Prótesis e Implantes / Enfisema Pulmonar / Broncoscopía Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Respirology Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos