Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Defining and Measuring Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review.
Bhise, Viraj; Rajan, Suja S; Sittig, Dean F; Morgan, Robert O; Chaudhary, Pooja; Singh, Hardeep.
Afiliación
  • Bhise V; Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Rajan SS; School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Sittig DF; School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Morgan RO; School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Chaudhary P; UT-Memorial Hermann Center for Health Care Quality and Safety, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Singh H; School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 33(1): 103-115, 2018 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28936618
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Physicians routinely encounter diagnostic uncertainty in practice. Despite its impact on health care utilization, costs and error, measurement of diagnostic uncertainty is poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review to describe how diagnostic uncertainty is defined and measured in medical practice.

METHODS:

We searched OVID Medline and PsycINFO databases from inception until May 2017 using a combination of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Additional search strategies included manual review of references identified in the primary search, use of a topic-specific database (AHRQ-PSNet) and expert input. We specifically focused on articles that (1) defined diagnostic uncertainty; (2) conceptualized diagnostic uncertainty in terms of its sources, complexity of its attributes or strategies for managing it; or (3) attempted to measure diagnostic uncertainty. KEY

RESULTS:

We identified 123 articles for full review, none of which defined diagnostic uncertainty. Three attributes of diagnostic uncertainty were relevant for measurement (1) it is a subjective perception experienced by the clinician; (2) it has the potential to impact diagnostic evaluation-for example, when inappropriately managed, it can lead to diagnostic delays; and (3) it is dynamic in nature, changing with time. Current methods for measuring diagnostic uncertainty in medical practice include (1) asking clinicians about their perception of uncertainty (surveys and qualitative interviews), (2) evaluating the patient-clinician encounter (such as by reviews of medical records, transcripts of patient-clinician communication and observation), and (3) experimental techniques (patient vignette studies).

CONCLUSIONS:

The term "diagnostic uncertainty" lacks a clear definition, and there is no comprehensive framework for its measurement in medical practice. Based on review findings, we propose that diagnostic uncertainty be defined as a "subjective perception of an inability to provide an accurate explanation of the patient's health problem." Methodological advancements in measuring diagnostic uncertainty can improve our understanding of diagnostic decision-making and inform interventions to reduce diagnostic errors and overuse of health care resources.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención a la Salud / Incertidumbre / Toma de Decisiones Clínicas / Medicina Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención a la Salud / Incertidumbre / Toma de Decisiones Clínicas / Medicina Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos