Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized, Phase IIb study investigating oliceridine (TRV130), a novel µ-receptor G-protein pathway selective (µ-GPS) modulator, for the management of moderate to severe acute pain following abdominoplasty.
Singla, Neil; Minkowitz, Harold S; Soergel, David G; Burt, David A; Subach, Ruth Ann; Salamea, Monica Y; Fossler, Michael J; Skobieranda, Franck.
Afiliación
  • Singla N; Lotus Clinical Research, Pasadena, CA.
  • Minkowitz HS; Memorial Hermann Memorial City Medical Center, Houston, TX.
  • Soergel DG; Trevena, Inc, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
  • Burt DA; Trevena, Inc, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
  • Subach RA; Trevena, Inc, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
  • Salamea MY; Trevena, Inc, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
  • Fossler MJ; Trevena, Inc, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
  • Skobieranda F; Trevena, Inc, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
J Pain Res ; 10: 2413-2424, 2017.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29062240
BACKGROUND: Oliceridine (TRV130), a novel µ-receptor G-protein pathway selective (µ-GPS) modulator, was designed to improve the therapeutic window of conventional opioids by activating G-protein signaling while causing low ß-arrestin recruitment to the µ receptor. This randomized, double-blind, patient-controlled analgesia Phase IIb study was conducted to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oliceridine compared with morphine and placebo in patients with moderate to severe pain following abdominoplasty (NCT02335294; oliceridine is an investigational agent not yet approved by the US Food and Drug Administration). METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive postoperative regimens of intravenous oliceridine (loading/patient-controlled demand doses [mg/mg]: 1.5/0.10 [regimen A]; 1.5/0.35 [regimen B]), morphine (4.0/1.0), or placebo with treatment initiated within 4 hours of surgery and continued as needed for 24 hours. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were treated (n=39, n=39, n=83, and n=39 in the oliceridine regimen A, oliceridine regimen B, morphine, and placebo groups, respectively). Patients were predominantly female (n=198 [99%]) and had a mean age of 38.2 years, weight of 71.2 kg, and baseline pain score of 7.7 (on 11-point numeric pain rating scale). Patients receiving the oliceridine regimens had reductions in average pain scores (model-based change in time-weighted average versus placebo over 24 hours) of 2.3 and 2.1 points, respectively (P=0.0001 and P=0.0005 versus placebo); patients receiving morphine had a similar reduction (2.1 points; P<0.0001 versus placebo). A lower prevalence of adverse events (AEs) related to nausea, vomiting, and respiratory function was observed with the oliceridine regimens than with morphine (P<0.05). Other AEs with oliceridine were generally dose-related and similar in nature to those observed with conventional opioids; no serious AEs were reported with oliceridine. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that oliceridine may provide effective, rapid analgesia in patients with moderate to severe postoperative pain, with an acceptable safety/tolerability profile and potentially wider therapeutic window than morphine.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pain Res Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pain Res Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article