Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
NUT Co Reactivity - ACquiring Knowledge for Elimination Recommendations (NUT CRACKER) study.
Elizur, A; Appel, M Y; Nachshon, L; Levy, M B; Epstein-Rigbi, N; Golobov, K; Goldberg, M R.
Afiliación
  • Elizur A; Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.
  • Appel MY; Department of Pediatrics, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Zerifin, Israel.
  • Nachshon L; Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.
  • Levy MB; Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.
  • Epstein-Rigbi N; Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.
  • Golobov K; Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.
  • Goldberg MR; Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.
Allergy ; 73(3): 593-601, 2018 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29127694
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ambiguities exist regarding the diagnosis of tree-nut allergy, necessitating either their elimination or the performance of oral food challenges (OFCs).

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the coincidences of allergies among tree-nuts and improve diagnostic testing to minimize the need for OFC.

METHODS:

Eighty-three patients prospectively evaluated for walnut, pecan, cashew, pistachio, hazelnut, and almond allergy. A history of previous reactions was obtained, and standardized skin prick tests (SPTs) using finely ground tree-nut solution and basophil activation tests (BAT) were performed. Patients underwent OFC for each tree-nut they eliminated and to which a reaction in the previous 2 years was not documented.

RESULTS:

While most patients were sensitized to 5-6 tree-nuts, over 50% were allergic to only 1-2 tree-nuts. The highest rate of allergy in sensitized patients was observed for walnut (74.6%) and cashew (65.6%). The rate of co-allergy for most tree-nuts was <30%. Two-thirds of walnut- and cashew-allergic patients were also allergic to pecan and pistachio, respectively, while all pecan- and pistachio-allergic patients were allergic to walnut and cashew, respectively. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for SPT and BAT was tree-nut dependent and yielded area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.75 to 0.94. Knowledge of coincident allergies in these pairs along with the combination of SPT and BAT correctly distinguished allergic from tolerant patients for walnut (87%), pecan (66%), cashew (71%), and pistachio (79%).

CONCLUSION:

The data presented here should assist in differentiating between allergic and tolerant patients, decrease the need for OFC, and allow for appropriate elimination recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas Cutáneas / Prueba de Desgranulación de los Basófilos / Hipersensibilidad a la Nuez Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Allergy Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas Cutáneas / Prueba de Desgranulación de los Basófilos / Hipersensibilidad a la Nuez Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Allergy Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel