Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Temporary closure of colostomy with suture before colostomy takedown improves the postoperative outcomes.
Hu, Wan-Hsiang; Lee, Ko-Chao; Tsai, Kai-Lung; Chen, Hong-Hwa.
Afiliación
  • Hu WH; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 123, Ta-Pei Rd., Niao-Sung District, Kaohsiung City, 83301, Taiwan.
  • Lee KC; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Tsai KL; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 123, Ta-Pei Rd., Niao-Sung District, Kaohsiung City, 83301, Taiwan.
  • Chen HH; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 123, Ta-Pei Rd., Niao-Sung District, Kaohsiung City, 83301, Taiwan.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 33(1): 47-52, 2018 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29167976
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Temporary loop colostomy is a common surgical procedure used to avoid complications in high-risk distal anastomosis as well as pelvic inflammation. Issues regarding postoperative outcomes of colostomy takedown have been widely discussed in the literature, wound infection especially. Temporary closure of colostomy with suture before takedown was adopted in our study, which provided excellent traction to aid mobilization of stomy and avoided stool spillage to downgrade the wound classification to "clean contamination." We aimed to determine the effects of the procedure on postoperative outcomes.

METHODS:

This was a prospective case-control study at a single tertiary medical center. Patients presenting for elective colostomy takedown were included. Allis clamp (n = 50) or silk suture (n = 60) was applied to mobilize the colostomy, and results were compared. Operative time and wound infection rate were measured as primary postoperative outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to demonstrate the association between the two groups and outcomes.

RESULTS:

In univariate analyses, significantly shorter operative time (median = 57 min, p = 0.003) and lower postoperative wound infection rate (3%, p = 0.03) were noted in the group receiving silk suture. Multivariate analyses results showed that silk suture was significantly associated with both operative time (B = - 8.5, p = 0.01) and wound infection (odds ratio = 0.18, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION:

With the advantage of enhancing traction and decreasing contamination, the temporary closure of colostomy with suture improved takedown outcomes, including a shorter operative time and lower wound infection rate.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Suturas / Colostomía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Suturas / Colostomía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán