Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility.
de Jong, Merel; Tamminga, Sietske J; van Es, Robert J J; Frings-Dresen, Monique H W; de Boer, Angela G E M.
Afiliación
  • de Jong M; Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Academic Medical Center, P.O. box 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Tamminga SJ; Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Academic Medical Center, P.O. box 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Es RJJ; Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Frings-Dresen MHW; Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Academic Medical Center, P.O. box 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • de Boer AGEM; Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Academic Medical Center, P.O. box 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. a.g.deboer@amc.uva.nl.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 66, 2018 01 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29321006
BACKGROUND: To assess the factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility of the Quality of Working Life Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (QWLQ-CS). METHODS: An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on QWLQ-CS data from a sample of employed cancer survivors to establish the final number of items and factorial structure of the QWLQ-CS. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. In a second sample of (self-)employed cancer survivors, construct validity was tested by convergent validity (correlations of QWLQ-CS with construct-related questionnaires), and discriminative validity (difference in QWLQ-CS scores between cancer survivors and employed people without cancer). In a subgroup of stable cancer survivors subtracted from the second sample, reproducibility was evaluated by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Standard Error of Measurement (SEM). RESULTS: EFA on QWLQ-CS data of 302 cancer survivors resulted in 23 items and five factors. The internal consistency of the QWLQ-CS was Cronbach's α = 0.91. Convergent validity on data of 130 cancer survivors resulted in r = 0.61-0.70. QWLQ-CS scores of these cancer survivors statistically differed (p = 0.04) from employed people without cancer (N = 45). Reproducibility of QWLQ-CS data from 87 cancer survivors demonstrated an ICC of 0.84 and a SEM of 9.59. CONCLUSIONS: The five-factor QWLQ-CS with 23 items and adequate internal consistency, construct validity, and reproducibility at group level can be used in clinical and occupational healthcare, and research settings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicometría / Supervivientes de Cáncer / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicometría / Supervivientes de Cáncer / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos