Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy in patients converting from carbamazepine.
Pazdera, Ladislav; Sperling, Michael R; Harvey, Jay H; Sam, Maria C; Strom, Laura A; Blum, David; Grinnell, Todd; Cheng, Hailong.
Afiliación
  • Pazdera L; Vestra Clinics, Rychnov nad Kneznou, Czech Republic.
  • Sperling MR; Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Harvey JH; Division of Epilepsy, Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Sam MC; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
  • Strom LA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Blum D; Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA.
  • Grinnell T; Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA.
  • Cheng H; Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA.
Epilepsia ; 59(3): 704-714, 2018 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29450890
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of prior use of carbamazepine (CBZ) and other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with a putatively similar mechanism of action (inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels; VGSCs) on seizure outcomes and tolerability when converting to eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), using data pooled from 2 controlled conversion-to-ESL monotherapy trials (studies: 093-045, 093-046). METHODS: Adults with treatment-resistant focal (partial-onset) seizures were randomized 2:1 to ESL 1600 or 1200 mg once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was study exit (meeting predefined exit criteria related to worsening seizure control) versus an historical control group. Other endpoints included change in seizure frequency, responder rate, and tolerability. Endpoints were analyzed for subgroups of patients who received CBZ (or any VGSC inhibitor [VGSCi]) during baseline versus those who received other AEDs. RESULTS: Of 365 patients in the studies, 332 were evaluable for efficacy. The higher risk of study exit in the subgroups that received CBZ (or any VGSCi) during baseline, versus other AEDs, was not statistically significant (hazard ratios were 1.49 for +CBZ vs -CBZ [P = .10] and 1.27 for +VGSCi vs. -VGSCi [P = .33]). Reductions in seizure frequency and responder rates were lower in patients who converted from CBZ or other VGSCi compared with those who converted from other AEDs. There were no notable differences in overall tolerability between subgroups, but the incidence of some adverse events (eg, dizziness, somnolence, nausea) differed between subgroups and/or between treatment periods. SIGNIFICANCE: Baseline use of CBZ or other major putative VGSC inhibitors did not appear to significantly increase the risk of study exit due to worsening seizure control, or to increase the frequency of side effects when converting to ESL monotherapy. However, bigger improvements in efficacy may be possible in patients converting to ESL monotherapy from an AED regimen that does not include a VGSC inhibitor.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carbamazepina / Dibenzazepinas / Sustitución de Medicamentos / Bloqueadores del Canal de Sodio Activado por Voltaje / Epilepsia Refractaria / Anticonvulsivantes Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Epilepsia Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: República Checa

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carbamazepina / Dibenzazepinas / Sustitución de Medicamentos / Bloqueadores del Canal de Sodio Activado por Voltaje / Epilepsia Refractaria / Anticonvulsivantes Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Epilepsia Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: República Checa