Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence and treatment of metachronous gastric cancer after proximal gastrectomy.
Iwata, Yoshinori; Ito, Seiji; Misawa, Kazunari; Ito, Yuichi; Komori, Koji; Abe, Tetsuya; Shimizu, Yasuhiro; Tajika, Masahiro; Niwa, Yasumasa; Yoshida, Kazuhiro; Kinoshita, Taira.
Afiliación
  • Iwata Y; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan. yoshinori_vb2@yahoo.co.jp.
  • Ito S; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Misawa K; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Ito Y; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Komori K; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Abe T; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Shimizu Y; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Tajika M; Department of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Niwa Y; Department of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Yoshida K; Department of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
  • Kinoshita T; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Surg Today ; 48(5): 552-557, 2018 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29460126
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is a widely accepted function-preserving surgical procedure; however, the incidence and treatment of metachronous gastric cancer (MGC) after PG have been the subject of a number of reports.

METHODS:

We collected data from 1576 consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January, 2003 and December, 2010, and analyzed the outcomes of 671 patients treated with PG or distal gastrectomy (DG) for cT1N0 disease. We also discuss the treatments for MGC.

RESULTS:

MGC was diagnosed within a median follow-up of 52.8 months after PG and DG in six (6.6%) and nine (1.8%) patients, respectively. The cumulative prevalence of MGC after PG was significantly higher than that after DG; P = 0.005. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed male sex and PG as significant risk factors for MGC (P = 0.014 and P = 0.026, respectively). Five of the six patients who underwent PG were treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection.

CONCLUSIONS:

The incidence of MGC after PG was significantly higher than that after DG. However, most of the MGCs that developed after PG could be treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Gastroscopía / Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias / Gastrectomía Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Today Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Gastroscopía / Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias / Gastrectomía Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Today Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón