Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition.
Guthrie, Michael D; Gilbert, Donald L; Huddleston, David A; Pedapati, Ernest V; Horn, Paul S; Mostofsky, Stewart H; Wu, Steve W.
Afiliación
  • Guthrie MD; College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati.
  • Gilbert DL; Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
  • Huddleston DA; Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
  • Pedapati EV; Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Division of Psychiatry, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
  • Horn PS; Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
  • Mostofsky SH; Center for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute.
  • Wu SW; Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; steve.wu@cchmc.org.
J Vis Exp ; (132)2018 02 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29553534
We describe the development of a reproducible, child-friendly motor response inhibition task suitable for online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) characterization of primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and inhibition. Motor response inhibition prevents unwanted actions and is abnormal in several neuropsychiatric conditions. TMS is a non-invasive technology that can quantify M1 excitability and inhibition using single- and paired-pulse protocols and can be precisely timed to study cortical physiology with high temporal resolution. We modified the original Slater-Hammel (S-H) stop signal task to create a "racecar" version with TMS pulses time-locked to intra-trial events. This task is self-paced, with each trial initiating after a button push to move the racecar towards the 800 ms target. GO trials require a finger-lift to stop the racecar just before this target. Interspersed randomly are STOP trials (25%) during which the dynamically adjusted stop signal prompts subjects to prevent finger-lift. For GO trials, TMS pulses were delivered at 650 ms after trial onset; whereas, for STOP trials, the TMS pulses occurred 150 ms after the stop signal. The timings of the TMS pulses were decided based on electroencephalography (EEG) studies showing event-related changes in these time ranges during stop signal tasks. This task was studied in 3 blocks at two study sites (n=38) and we recorded behavioral performance and event-related motor-evoked potentials (MEP). Regression modelling was used to analyze MEP amplitudes using age as a covariate with multiple independent variables (sex, study site, block, TMS pulse condition [single- vs. paired-pulse], trial condition [GO, successful STOP, failed STOP]). The analysis showed that TMS pulse condition (p<0.0001) and its interaction with trial condition (p=0.009) were significant. Future applications for this online S-H/TMS paradigm include the addition of simultaneous EEG acquisition to measure TMS-evoked EEG potentials. A potential limitation is that in children, the TMS pulse sound could affect behavioral task performance.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Potenciales Evocados Motores / Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Vis Exp Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Potenciales Evocados Motores / Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Vis Exp Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article