Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Peer support for physical activity adoption among breast cancer survivors: Do the helped resemble the helpers?
DeMello, M M; Pinto, B M; Mitchell, S; Dunsiger, S I; Stein, K.
Afiliación
  • DeMello MM; College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Pinto BM; College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Mitchell S; College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Dunsiger SI; Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, Miriam Hospital and W. Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Stein K; Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 27(3): e12849, 2018 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29637645
ABSTRACT
Interventions offering peer mentoring programmes promoting moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) have shown improvements in MVPA and well-being from baseline; however, research is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the physical activity (PA) levels and psychosocial well-being of coaches and participants at baseline and following a 12-week intervention. Breast cancer survivors (<5 years) were recruited and randomised into either exercise (Reach-to-Recovery (RTR) + PA) or control (RTR Control). Participants in both groups were individually assigned one of the 18 available coaches who delivered either the MVPA intervention or the control condition via telephone. PA (7-Day PA Recall), psychosocial well-being, fatigue and mood were assessed at baseline and intervention completion. Seventy-six breast cancer survivors (average age = 55.62 (±9.55)) were randomised. At baseline, all participants showed significantly lower MVPA (p = .001) and well-being (p < .05) as compared to coaches. However, post-intervention showed significant improvement in PA and well-being in RTR + PA, so that they were no longer significantly different from the coaches. Post-intervention, MVPA (p < .01), quality of life (p < .05) and fatigue (p < .05) remained significantly lower in RTR Controls compared to coaches. Future interventions should consider the behavioural patterns not only of the participants, but also of those who deliver the interventions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grupo Paritario / Apoyo Social / Neoplasias de la Mama / Ejercicio Físico / Tutoría / Supervivientes de Cáncer / Promoción de la Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grupo Paritario / Apoyo Social / Neoplasias de la Mama / Ejercicio Físico / Tutoría / Supervivientes de Cáncer / Promoción de la Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos