Visual function assessed by visually evoked potentials in optic pathway low-grade gliomas with and without neurofibromatosis type 1.

PURPOSE: To investigate the contribution of full-field transient pattern-reversal visually evoked potentials (PRVEP) on cross-sectional evaluations of visual function in patients with and without neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) affected by optic pathway low-grade gliomas (OPLGG). METHODS: Participants were children and adolescents referred for visual function evaluation and receiving treatment for OPLGG, linked (NF1-OPLGG) or not to NF1 (Non-NF1-OPLGG). An age-adjusted control group was included for comparison. Monocular full-field PRVEPs were recorded from each eye in accordance with ISCEV standards. Parameters of peak-to-peak P100 amplitude (µV) and P100 peak time (ms) were measured. Cutoff normative values obtained from controls for 15' and 60' check sizes were ≥ 9.0 µV for N75-P100 amplitude and ≤ 103.0 ms for P100 peak time. The association of age, gender, tumor resection and NF1 with P100 amplitude reduction and P100 peak time delay was explored by Firth logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Participants were 30 patients (15 males, 60% Non-NF1) with ages from 3.6 to 19.9 years (mean ± SD = 9.2 ± 3.8 years; median = 8.4 years) and 19 controls (12 males) with ages from 3.7 to 19.9 years (mean ± SD = 10.4 ± 4.9 years; median = 9.5 years). Overall, 68% of tested eyes presented reduced P100 amplitudes for both check sizes (46% in the NF-1 and 83% in the Non-NF1) and delayed P100 for both check sizes (38% in NF1 and 89% in Non-NF1). Absence of NF1 adjusted for age, gender and tumor resection was significantly associated with marginally reduced P100 amplitude for 15' checks [odds ratio (OR): 6.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96-40.94; p = 0.055]. CONCLUSIONS: Full-field PRVEP on cross-sectional evaluations contributed to detect visual dysfunction in two-thirds of patients with OPLGG by highlighting subclinical evidence of visual loss. Abnormalities were more frequent and more severe in OPLGG not linked to NF1 than in NF1-OPLGG; however, there was a difference in surgical management between these groups. PRVEP parameters may provide reliable evidence of visual pathway involvement in OPLGG, helping to hasten treatment before optic atrophy is detected.