Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Discrepancies in measuring bladder volumes with bedside ultrasound and bladder scanning in the intensive care unit: A pilot study.
Prentice, Donna M; Sona, Carrie; Wessman, Brian T; Ablordeppey, Enyo A; Isakow, Warren; Arroyo, Cassandra; Schallom, Marilyn.
Afiliación
  • Prentice DM; 1Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Sona C; 1Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Wessman BT; 2Department of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Ablordeppey EA; 2Department of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Isakow W; 3Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Arroyo C; 1Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Schallom M; 1Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Intensive Care Soc ; 19(2): 122-126, 2018 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29796068
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Intensive care unit patients are at risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Earlier removal of catheters may be possible with accurate measurement of bladder volume. The purpose was to compare measured bladder volumes with bedside ultrasound, bladder scanner, and urine volume.

DESIGN:

Prospective correlational descriptive study.

SETTING:

Surgical/trauma intensive care unit and medical intensive care unit. PATIENTS Renal dialysis patients with less than 100 ml of urine in 24 h prior to urinary catheter removal and patients with suspected catheter obstruction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

A physician trained in ultrasound and an advanced practice registered nurse trained in bladder scanning measured bladder volume; each blinded to the other's measurement. Device used first (ultrasound or bladder scanner) alternated daily. The intensive care unit team determined need for intermittent catheterization or treatment for suspected obstruction. Fifty-one measurements from 13 patients were obtained with results reported in milliliters. Ultrasound measurements were a mean volume of 72.1 ± 127 (range 1.7-666) and the bladder scanner measurements were 117 ± 131 (0-529). On six occasions in five dialysis patients, urine volume measurement was available. The mean difference in ultrasound-urine volume mean difference was 0.5 ± 37.8 (range -68 to 38.2) and the bladder scanner-urine volume was 132 ± 167 (-72 to 397). Two patients with suspected catheter obstructions had ultrasound, bladder scanner, urine volume measurements, respectively (1) 539, 51, >300 (began voiding before catheter replaced); (2) 666, 68, 1000 with catheter replacement. Conditions leading to greatest differences were obesity, indwelling catheter and ascites.

CONCLUSIONS:

These results demonstrate the inaccuracy of the bladder scanner. Ultrasound measurements appear more accurate. To remove urinary catheters in patients with minimal to low urine output, serial ultrasound measurements can be used to monitor bladder volumes and return of renal function.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Intensive Care Soc Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Intensive Care Soc Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos