Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability and validity of the Brief Pain Inventory in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Chen, Y-W; HajGhanbari, B; Road, J D; Coxson, H O; Camp, P G; Reid, W D.
Afiliación
  • Chen YW; Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • HajGhanbari B; Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Road JD; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Coxson HO; Department of Radiology, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Camp PG; Department of Physical Therapy, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Reid WD; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eur J Pain ; 22(10): 1718-1726, 2018 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29883526
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pain is prevalent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) appears to be a feasible questionnaire to assess this symptom. However, the reliability and validity of the BPI have not been determined in individuals with COPD. This study aimed to determine the internal consistency, test-retest reliability and validity (construct, convergent, divergent and discriminant) of the BPI in individuals with COPD.

METHODS:

In order to examine the test-retest reliability, individuals with COPD were recruited from pulmonary rehabilitation programmes to complete the BPI twice 1 week apart. In order to investigate validity, de-identified data was retrieved from two previous studies, including forced expiratory volume in 1-s, age, sex and data from four questionnaires the BPI, short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) and Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) questionnaire.

RESULTS:

In total, 123 participants were included in the analyses (eligible data were retrieved from 86 participants and additional 37 participants were recruited). The BPI demonstrated excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It also showed convergent validity with the SF-MPQ and divergent validity with the SF-36. The factor analysis yielded two factors of the BPI, which demonstrated that the two domains of the BPI measure the intended constructs. The BPI can also discriminate pain levels among COPD patients with varied levels of quality of life (SF-36) and physical activity (CHAMPS).

CONCLUSION:

The BPI is a reliable and valid pain questionnaire that can be used to evaluate pain in COPD.

SIGNIFICANCE:

This study formally established the reliability and validity of the BPI in individuals with COPD, which have not been determined in this patient group. The results of this study provide strong evidence that assessment results from this pain questionnaire are reliable and valid.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor / Dimensión del Dolor / Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Pain Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor / Dimensión del Dolor / Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Pain Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá