Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimising first- and second-line treatment strategies for untreated major depressive disorder - the SUN☺D study: a pragmatic, multi-centre, assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial.
Kato, Tadashi; Furukawa, Toshi A; Mantani, Akio; Kurata, Ken'ichi; Kubouchi, Hajime; Hirota, Susumu; Sato, Hirotoshi; Sugishita, Kazuyuki; Chino, Bun; Itoh, Kahori; Ikeda, Yoshio; Shinagawa, Yoshihiro; Kondo, Masaki; Okamoto, Yasumasa; Fujita, Hirokazu; Suga, Motomu; Yasumoto, Shingo; Tsujino, Naohisa; Inoue, Takeshi; Fujise, Noboru; Akechi, Tatsuo; Yamada, Mitsuhiko; Shimodera, Shinji; Watanabe, Norio; Inagaki, Masatoshi; Miki, Kazuhira; Ogawa, Yusuke; Takeshima, Nozomi; Hayasaka, Yu; Tajika, Aran; Shinohara, Kiyomi; Yonemoto, Naohiro; Tanaka, Shiro; Zhou, Qi; Guyatt, Gordon H.
Afiliación
  • Kato T; Aratama Kokorono Clinic, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Furukawa TA; Department of Health Promotion of Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. furukawa@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
  • Mantani A; Mantani Mental Clinic, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Kurata K; Kabe Mental Health Clinic, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Kubouchi H; Kokokara Clinic, Kochi, Japan.
  • Hirota S; Hirota Clinic, Kurume, Japan.
  • Sato H; Harimayabashi Clinic, Kochi, Japan.
  • Sugishita K; Oji Mental Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Chino B; Ginza Taimei Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Itoh K; Sinsapporo Mental Clinic, Sapporo, Japan.
  • Ikeda Y; Narumi Himawari Clinic, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Shinagawa Y; Shiki Clinic, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Kondo M; Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Okamoto Y; Department of Neuropsychiatry, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Fujita H; Center to Promote Creativity in Medical Education, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan.
  • Suga M; Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yasumoto S; Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kurume University Medical School, Kurume, Japan.
  • Tsujino N; Department of Psychiatry, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Inoue T; Department of Neuropsychiatry, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Fujise N; Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Akechi T; Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Yamada M; Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Shimodera S; Center to Promote Creativity in Medical Education, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan.
  • Watanabe N; Department of Health Promotion of Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
  • Inagaki M; Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
  • Miki K; Miki Mental Clinic, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Ogawa Y; Department of Health Promotion of Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
  • Takeshima N; Department of Health Promotion of Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
  • Hayasaka Y; Department of Health Promotion of Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
  • Tajika A; Department of Health Promotion of Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
  • Shinohara K; Department of Health Promotion of Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
  • Yonemoto N; Department of Biostatistics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Tanaka S; Department of Clinical Biostatistics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Zhou Q; Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Guyatt GH; Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
BMC Med ; 16(1): 103, 2018 07 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29991347
BACKGROUND: For patients starting treatment for depression, current guidelines recommend titrating the antidepressant dosage to the maximum of the licenced range if tolerated. When patients do not achieve remission within several weeks, recommendations include adding or switching to another antidepressant. However, the relative merits of these guideline strategies remain unestablished. METHODS: This multi-centre, open-label, assessor-blinded, pragmatic trial involved two steps. Step 1 used open-cluster randomisation, allocating clinics into those titrating sertraline up to 50 mg/day or 100 mg/day by week 3. Step 2 used central randomisation to allocate patients who did not remit after 3 weeks of treatment to continue sertraline, to add mirtazapine or to switch to mirtazapine. The primary outcome was depression severity measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (scores between 0 and 27; higher scores, greater depression) at week 9. We applied mixed-model repeated-measures analysis adjusted for key baseline covariates. RESULTS: Between December 2010 and March 2015, we recruited 2011 participants with hitherto untreated major depression at 48 clinics in Japan. In step 1, 970 participants were allocated to the 50 mg/day and 1041 to the 100 mg/day arms; 1927 (95.8%) provided primary outcomes. There was no statistically significant difference in the adjusted PHQ-9 score at week 9 between the 50 mg/day arm and the 100 mg/day arm (0.25 point, 95% confidence interval (CI), - 0.58 to 1.07, P = 0.55). Other outcomes proved similar in the two groups. In step 2, 1646 participants not remitted by week 3 were randomised to continue sertraline (n = 551), to add mirtazapine (n = 537) or to switch to mirtazapine (n = 558): 1613 (98.0%) provided primary outcomes. At week 9, adding mirtazapine achieved a reduction in PHQ-9 scores of 0.99 point (0.43 to 1.55, P = 0.0012); switching achieved a reduction of 1.01 points (0.46 to 1.56, P = 0.0012), both relative to continuing sertraline. Combination increased the percentage of remission by 12.4% (6.1 to 19.0%) and switching by 8.4% (2.5 to 14.8%). There were no differences in adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with new onset depression, we found no advantage of titrating sertraline to 100 mg vs 50 mg. Patients unremitted by week 3 gained a small benefit in reduction of depressive symptoms at week 9 by switching sertraline to mirtazapine or by adding mirtazapine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01109693 . Registered on 23 April 2010.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastorno Depresivo Mayor / Antidepresivos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastorno Depresivo Mayor / Antidepresivos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón