Effects of Ivabradine on Hemodynamic and Functional Parameters in Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ivabradine is licensed as add-on therapy in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), normal sinus rhythm, and suboptimal heart rate (HR) control, but effects are not fully established. This study sought to assess the impact of ivabradine therapy on hemodynamic and functional outcome measures in all patients with LVSD. METHODS: MEDLINE (1996-2017), Embase (1996-2017), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov , and ISI Web of Science were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing standard medical therapy (SMT) plus ivabradine to SMT alone for patients with LVSD of any severity. Each trial was assessed using the Cochrane Collaborations Risk of Bias tool. RESULTS: Eight RCTs with 17,823 patients were included. Add-on use of ivabradine reduced resting HR (mean difference [MD] 10.3 bpm; p < 0.001), improved ejection fraction (EF) (MD 3.6%, p < 0.001), and preserved systolic blood pressure (MD 3.4 mmHg; p = 0.09). Stratified analyses according to severity of LVSD did not influence conferred benefits on HR and EF. Small improvements were noted in exercise tolerance (standardized MD 5.9 s; p = 0.004) and peak oxygen consumption (MD 2.9 ml/kg/min; p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Adjunct therapy with ivabradine in patients with LVSD results in a favorable hemodynamic profile and correlates with improved functional capacity. Benefits appear to be broadly preserved irrespective of baseline EF. This was a meta-analysis of RCTs, though limited by exclusion of post hoc analyses, lack of access to patient level data, and inter-study variability in some baseline characteristics. Further, large-scale RCTs are warranted to evaluate effectiveness of ivabradine in cohorts with non-severe LVSD.