Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment recommendations for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma lack worldwide consensus.
Palmer, Joshua D; Bhamidipati, Deepak; Mehta, Minesh; Williams, Noelle L; Dicker, Adam P; Werner-Wasik, Maria; Shi, Wenyin.
Afiliación
  • Palmer JD; Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43215, USA. Joshua.palmer@osumc.edu.
  • Bhamidipati D; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Mehta M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Fl, USA.
  • Williams NL; Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Levine Cancer Institute at Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
  • Dicker AP; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Werner-Wasik M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Shi W; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Neurooncol ; 140(2): 421-426, 2018 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30088191
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Glioblastoma predominantly occurs in the 6th and 7th decades of life. The optimal treatment paradigm for elderly patients is not well established. We sampled current worldwide management strategies for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

METHODS:

A web-based survey was developed and distributed to 168 radiation oncologists, neuro-oncologists and neurosurgeons identified through the United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties and the CNS committees for North American, European and Asian Organizations. Questions addressed treatment recommendations in order to determine whether management consensus exists in this patient subset.

RESULTS:

There were 68 (40%) respondents. Across respondents, the most important factors directing treatment were KPS (94%) and MGMT methylation status (71%). Only 37% of respondents strictly factor in age when making treatment recommendations with 59% defining elderly as greater than 70 years-old. The most common treatment recommendations for MGMT-methylated elderly patients with KPS > 70 were as follows standard chemoRT (49%), short course chemoRT (39%), and temozolomide alone (30%). The most common treatment recommendations for MGMT-unmethylated patients with KPS > 70 were as follows short course RT alone (51%), standard chemoRT (38%), and short course chemoRT (28%). Treatment recommendations for patients with KPS < 50 were short course RT alone (40%), best supportive care (57%), or TMZ alone (17%). Individuals practicing in North America were significantly more likely to recommend standard chemoradiation for patients compared to their European counterparts.

CONCLUSION:

Worldwide treatment recommendations for elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM vary widely. Further randomized studies are needed to elucidate the optimal treatment strategy for this subset of patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Glioblastoma Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurooncol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Glioblastoma Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurooncol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos